Dear Editor,In a recent paper Pakzad (2009) studied the occurrence of large-amplitude solitary waves in a dusty plasma with cold negatively charged dust, nonthermal positive ions and Boltzmann distributed electrons, using a Sagdeev pseudopotential method. He discussed the influence of the parameters characterizing the degree of nonthermality, the ion-to-electron temperature ratio and the relative species' densities on the existence domains where negative solitary waves can occur. The main result claimed by Pakzad (2009) seems to be that for some values of the nonthermality parameter the minimum and maximum Mach numbers coincide, which prevents the existence of negative solitary wave solutions. The possibility that there might be positive solitary structures was not mentioned nor investigated.Unfortunately for the author, not only was exactly the same problem (finding large-amplitude dust-acoustic solitary waves) for exactly the same plasma configuration (cold negatively charged dust, nonthermal positive ions and Boltzmann distributed electrons) treated by us (Verheest and Pillay 2008) with exactly the same Sagdeev pseudopotential method, but this was done in much greater detail and with more attention to the physical limitations on the existence of solitary structures in compositional parameter and Mach number space. We never claimed to be the only or first ones in combining nonthermal species with dust, but we tried to discuss the specific problem and plasma configuration in a thorough way. Our paper was published a year and a half before Pakzad submitted his work, but it is not even cited in the reference list.We found that one should not limit the treatment to negative solitary waves, the existence of which is bounded in Mach number from above by infinite dust compression, and showed that there can also be a range of positive solitary waves, the existence of which ends when a positive double layer is encountered. The double layer Mach numbers then provide the upper bounds on the positive polarity side. There are even regions in compositional parameter space where both negative and positive structures can coexist.To be more specific about our own work, we clearly indicated that, depending on the relative densities of the negative species (dust and electrons), negative solitary waves were not possible when the ionic nonthermality parameter exceeds a critical maximum, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3 of Verheest and Pillay (2008) and mentioned in the discussion thereof. Critical values for the nonthermality parameter are encountered whenever the lower Mach number curve (translating the required convexity condition for the Sagdeev pseudopotential to admit solitary waves) crosses the upper Mach number curve, seemingly Pakzad's main result.Such crossings, however, occur in many plasma models, given changes in one or more compositional parameters, when existence domains for solitary structures are plotted. This is illustrated, e.g., by Fig. 6 of McKenzie et al. (2004), to quote just one among many papers in the literature, ...