2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.1148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durvalumab After Sequential Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III, Unresectable NSCLC: The Phase 2 PACIFIC-6 Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Durvalumab treatment, which lasted for a median duration of 11 months, was also well tolerated in the real-world setting, with safety observations being aligned with the known profile of durvalumab administered after CRT in the unresectable, stage III NSCLC setting. 14,15,28 The outcomes from PACIFIC-R align with other realworld studies of the PACIFIC regimen. [29][30][31][32][33] For instance, Taugner et al 30 reported a rwPFS rate of 62% at 12 months with durvalumab in their prospective study, which is consistent with the corresponding rate from PACIFIC-R.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Durvalumab treatment, which lasted for a median duration of 11 months, was also well tolerated in the real-world setting, with safety observations being aligned with the known profile of durvalumab administered after CRT in the unresectable, stage III NSCLC setting. 14,15,28 The outcomes from PACIFIC-R align with other realworld studies of the PACIFIC regimen. [29][30][31][32][33] For instance, Taugner et al 30 reported a rwPFS rate of 62% at 12 months with durvalumab in their prospective study, which is consistent with the corresponding rate from PACIFIC-R.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…21 The favorable real-world outcomes found in the sCRT subset of PACIFIC-R complement recently published findings from the phase 2, single-arm, PA-CIFIC-6 trial, which revealed encouraging outcomes with durvalumab after sCRT. 28 Together, the findings of these studies suggest that durvalumab after sCRT could be a reasonable treatment strategy for patients who are considered unsuitable for cCRT; the benefit of this strategy is currently being investigated in the phase 3 PACIFIC-5 trial (NCT03706690).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For patients with advanced NSCLC who could not tolerate concurrent chemoradiotherapy, sequential chemoradiotherapy was a standard treatment. In August 2022, the phase 2 PACFIC–6 trial reported durvalumab after sequential chemoradiotherapy achieved acceptable safety and encouraging efficacy ( 82 ). The phase 3 PACFIC–5 trial is ongoing to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab after sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC ( 82 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the 3-year OS rates in PACIFIC and PACIFIC-R (NCT03798535) [90] and the sCRT and cCRT cohorts in the GEMSTONE-301 trial were 57.9%, 56.7%, 59.0%, and 54.1%, respectively (Table 6, Figure 3). Studies are currently testing differences in the combination patterns of ICI therapy and sCRT/cCRT according to differences in administration timing [91][92][93][94][95][96] (Figure 2). With respect to biomarkers, Moding et al [97] assessed the MRD status via ctDNA dynamic monitoring to explore its value in predicting the prognosis of patients with LA-NSCLC who received consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy.…”
Section: Emerging Explorations On Top Of Pacific Modalitymentioning
confidence: 99%