Durkheim and Weber on the social implications of new information and communication technologies

Abstract

Max Weber and Emile Durkheim made an important contribution to our understanding of new information and communication technologies (ICTs). While they did not discuss ICTs in their work, they provided conceptual tools at the macro-, meso-and microsocial levels that help us understand the use of ICTs. We examine how Weber's iron cage and Durkheim's mechanical solidarity and ritual present a coherent account of how ICTs sustain cohesion and also enmesh us in mediated interactions in complex societies. Thus, they directly address the question of the implications of increasingly mediated relationships, which is overlooked by theories that focus only on the relation between individuals and technology. Unlike other theorists who do focus on the societal level, Weber and Durkheim are more concerned with their routine workings, providing a more grounded, everyday, and in this sense realistic understanding of ICTs and social change.

Modeling the second-level digital divide: A five-country study of social differences in Internet use

“…Just like grammar or arithmetic, having online skills and knowledge is increasingly expected in all spheres of everyday networked life in more economically developed countries. Since various types of Internet use are associated with corresponding fields of societal participation (Helsper, 2012), Internet use is becoming imperative rather than a mere convenience (Schroeder and Ling, 2014). Consequently, this study addresses the question of how far Internet uses depend on sociodemographic attributes in countries with high Internet penetration.…”

General self-efficacy in the Norwegian population: Differences and similarities between sociodemographic groups

“…Relationships start, change and end, and may be organized in ways that differ from those traditionally established [12]. The technologies by which we do many of our daily chores also change more rapidly than ever before, with differing interpretations concerning the effects on individuals and society at large [13]. As a result, having self-efficacy for a range of complexly connected tasks in a changing societal context is vital for a person's everyday functioning.…”

The Ethics of Psychometrics in Social Media: A Rawlsian Approach

“…Where Rawls argues for fair social contracts in a society that it is difficult for individuals to abandon, it is entirely possible to avoid using social media (at least until the time of writing). Unlike basic Internet access or ownership of a cell phone, which Schroeder and Ling [24] likens to a Durkheimian social fact, we have not yet arrived at a point where engagements with social media platforms are necessary to function as a citizen in society. You don't need to be on Twitter to pay your taxes or need an Instagram account to vote.…”