Engineering a Cathedral 1993
DOI: 10.1680/eac.16842.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durham Cathedral tower vibrations during bell-ringing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Muller [12], Steiner [16] and Schutz [14] focus on Central European mounting system which is also considered in the German DIN standard [1]. We can find similar studies concerning the Spanish system [2,3] and the English system [6,7]. Ivorra et.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Muller [12], Steiner [16] and Schutz [14] focus on Central European mounting system which is also considered in the German DIN standard [1]. We can find similar studies concerning the Spanish system [2,3] and the English system [6,7]. Ivorra et.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The fact that the damping coefficient is so low usually causes a high dynamic amplification factor when the excitation frequencies from the turning/oscillation of the bells come close to one of the tower's natural frequencies. (2007) 1800-5000 DIN 4178 (DIN, 2005) 3000-7000 Gentile and Saisi (2007) 1718- 1772Julio et al (2008 4800 Schmidt (2007) 1000 Wilson and Selby (1993) 1425 (2007) 2 . 0 0 .…”
Section: Global Dynamic Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the masonry towers containing bells that follow the English system, besides the above-mentioned study by Lewis, also important are those by Clouston (1970), who investigated the effects of bells that turned through 3608, and also those by Wilson and Selby, who installed measuring equipment and studied many towers in their work on the effects of the dynamic forces generated by the ringing of bells (Wilson and Selby, 1993;Selby and Wilson, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durham Cathedral tower displayed movement due to bell ringing and was ideal for the authors to measure for several reasons. First, there were ten bells in a frame 60 m above the foundation level [6], and such a large mass swinging at such a height produced measurable tower displacements on the order of 0.43 mm. The frame was constructed from structural steel fixed into the masonry of the tower, which was the most effective frame arrangement to minimise tower vibrations according to [2], and the MEMS sensors coupled with a low-frequency accelerometer for displacement monitoring could validate the effectiveness of this arrangement in terms of minimising vibrations.…”
Section: Durham Cathedralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bells are hung in either a N-S or an E-W orientation and the mass of the largest bell is 1425 kg. The maximum horizontal and vertical forces produced by the bells when rung individually using the procedure described in [5] are available in [6]. The velocities in the N-S and E-W directions were measured using high-sensitivity low-frequency geophones (velocity transducers) with a pen trace, and the maximum velocity recorded was 3.5 mm/s at the ringing chamber whilst ringing rounds one to ten.…”
Section: Durham Cathedralmentioning
confidence: 99%