2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2273652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration Dependence and Labor Market Conditions: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

39
350
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(391 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
39
350
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaini et al (2012) report in this country lower employment rates for cohorts graduating in a recession only during the first two years and no wage penalty. The authors advance two potential explanations: (1) a high minimum wage dampens the effect on wages and (2) a persistently high unemployment rate, such that employers use unemployment less as a negative signal in the hiring process (Biewen and Steffes, 2010;Kroft et al, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gaini et al (2012) report in this country lower employment rates for cohorts graduating in a recession only during the first two years and no wage penalty. The authors advance two potential explanations: (1) a high minimum wage dampens the effect on wages and (2) a persistently high unemployment rate, such that employers use unemployment less as a negative signal in the hiring process (Biewen and Steffes, 2010;Kroft et al, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More recently, correspondence tests have been used to study discrimination based on other grounds, such as beauty, criminal background and sexual orientation (Baert and Verhofstadt, 2015;Drydakis, 2009;Drydakis, 2011;Rooth, 2009). In addition, scholars have started to employ correspondence experiments to study phenomena other than labour market discrimination in strict sense, such as unemployment duration dependence and the labour market penalty of motherhood (Baert, 2014;Eriksson and Rooth, 2014;Kroft et al, 2013).…”
Section: Correspondence Experimental Evidence On Age Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the explanation of this phenomenon there is, however, a debate in the literature (Machin and Manning 1999: 12): according to some studies, unobserved heterogeneity explains this outcome, whereby the most employable workers leave unemployment quickly while the least employable remain in the group of the unemployed. Other authors have argued that there is true duration dependence, meaning either that long spells of unemployment reduce reemployment prospects because the workers lose their knowhow, motivation and selfconfidence or that employers perceive long unemployment spells as a negative signal of workers' abilities (Pissarides 1992;Flückiger 2002: 15;Eriksson andRooth 2014: 1029;Kroft et al 2013Kroft et al : 1128.…”
Section: Unemployment Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%