1982
DOI: 10.1121/1.387581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary

Abstract: The presence of a phrase boundary is often marked in speech by phrase-final lengthening-a lengthening of the final stressed syllable of the phrase and pause at the phrase boundary. The present study investigates (a) whether listeners use the feature of phrase-final lengthening to parse syntactically ambiguous sentences such as "Kate or Pat and Tony will come," where the position of a phrase boundary after "Kate" represents one meaning, and after "Pat" another meaning, and (b) whether listeners use phrase-final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
127
3
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
127
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Intonational cues were removed since all final versions of a sentence now had the same intonation contour. (b) Timing cues were removed by the splicing manipulation in two ways (i) in the spliced versions timing cues would suggest one reading, while the critical segment would suggest the other, and (ii) in any case disruption of the smooth timing pattern of the utterance by the cross splicing would result in the normally efficient processing of rhythmic cues to syntax (Lehiste, 1977;Scott, 1982) being severely disrupted (Martin, 1979;Meltzer, Martin, Mills, Imhoff, & Zohar, 1976). This disruption applies equally to phrase boundary readings spliced into a no-phrase boundary context, and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(a) Intonational cues were removed since all final versions of a sentence now had the same intonation contour. (b) Timing cues were removed by the splicing manipulation in two ways (i) in the spliced versions timing cues would suggest one reading, while the critical segment would suggest the other, and (ii) in any case disruption of the smooth timing pattern of the utterance by the cross splicing would result in the normally efficient processing of rhythmic cues to syntax (Lehiste, 1977;Scott, 1982) being severely disrupted (Martin, 1979;Meltzer, Martin, Mills, Imhoff, & Zohar, 1976). This disruption applies equally to phrase boundary readings spliced into a no-phrase boundary context, and vice versa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) a fall-rise in the fundamental frequency contour (Cooper & Sorensen, 1977;Lea, 1972;'t Hart & Cohen, 1973), (b) a pause (Boomer, 1965;GoldmanEisler, 1972;Grosjean & Deschamps, 1975), (c) lengthening of the final stressed syllable of a phrase (Cooper, Paccia and Lapointe, 1978;Klatt, 1975;Lindblom & Rapp, 1973;Scott, 1982), (d) lengthening of the foot (interstress interval) which contains the phrase boundary (Lehiste, Olive, & Streeter, 1976;Scott, 1982), and (e) changes in amplitude (Streeter, 1978). The first four of these features, at least, can be used by listeners as perceptual cues to the location of a major syntactic boundary (Collier and 't Hart, 1975;Lehiste et al, 1976;Scott, 1982;Streeter, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grammatical functions of prosody include the segmenting of utterances into prosodic phrases; the ends of phrases are signalled by a number of prosodic factors (forms) including: pause (Butcher, 1981); lengthening of the final syllable (Scott, 1982); and the presence of nuclear tone (Cruttenden, 1997), located at or near the end of the utterance. Such boundary markers have been collectively designated 'boundary tone' (Pierrehumbert, 1987).…”
Section: Prosodic Functions and Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that "rate" was taken to refer to both final syllable lengthening, i.e. relative syllable rate, a crucial indicator in prosodic phrasing (Scott, 1982;Katz, Beach, Jenouri & Verma, 1996), and tempo, or overall speech-rate, important for affective distinctions. Such a blurring of distinctions is by no means an isolated occurrence in the literature involving prosody research, and highlights the need for better definition of the forms and functions of prosody.…”
Section: Prosodic Functions and Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%