2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00035-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
179
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
179
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…13). A previously reported classification system entirely based on knee flexion angle and the angles of the thigh and calf overestimated walking by approximately 11% and underestimated stair climbing by approximately 8% [39]. However, our accuracy of classifying force curves for walking and stair climbing decreased to between 50% and 62%.…”
Section: A Wearable Force and Kinematics Monitoring Devicecontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13). A previously reported classification system entirely based on knee flexion angle and the angles of the thigh and calf overestimated walking by approximately 11% and underestimated stair climbing by approximately 8% [39]. However, our accuracy of classifying force curves for walking and stair climbing decreased to between 50% and 62%.…”
Section: A Wearable Force and Kinematics Monitoring Devicecontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Stair climbing is another common activity of daily living, with the ratio of stair climbing cycles to walking cycles averaging approximately 1:25 in patients with THA [39]. Tibial forces during stair climbing increased to a mean of 3.2 9 BW at 1 year [11].…”
Section: Stair Climbingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of total time vs. 0.4% (±0.4% S.D.) for stair climbing (Morlock et al 2001). It can be suggested that the types of activity undertaken may become more varied by the end of the recovery and rehabilitation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, intervention studies that address fall risk in older people (e.g., NajaW et al 2002), studies of the eVects of interventions in Parkinson's disease patients (Keijsers et al 2006), pain (Buchser et al 2005) or patients after orthopaedic surgery (Morlock et al 2001). Although these and other studies demonstrate the relevance of activity monitors, their full potential for evaluating changes in activity patterns as a result of interventions has not yet been attained.…”
Section: Activity Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%