The initial treatment of patients suffering from acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is, frankly, straight forward and internationally standardised. Depending on age, comorbidities and performance status, either chemotherapy aiming at remission induction or a palliative therapy will be applied. Given that the former will be sufficient to achieve a complete remission (CR) in most patients, the incorporation of established prognostic factors will then pave the way for the optimal consolidating treatment regimen (Dohner et al, 2017). However, for patients with refractory or relapsed (r/r) AML, the route is heterogeneous and depends, amongst other factors, on the local therapeutic doctrine (i.e. the institution where a patient is treated), according to the individual or local health insurance policy and the availability to participate in clinical trials.In this issue, Davies et al (2017) report the results of a prospective clinical phase II trial in which r/r AML and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients underwent sequential chemotherapy and subsequent T-replete allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHST). Traditionally, T-cell deplete AHST is given in a sequential manner after delivering remission-inducing chemotherapy (Schmid et al, 2005). With modifications of the applied chemotherapy, most of these approaches were performed with in-vivo T-cell depletion using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and donor-lymphocyte infusions (DLI) after engraftment. However, dose-dense chemotherapy and sequential conditioning with the use of ATG is prone to viral infections/reactivations and the availability of DLIs can be burdensome, especially in the unrelated setting. Furthermore, the role of ATG has not yet been defined prospectively in the context of transplantation regimens with sequential re-induction chemotherapy and conditioning regimens even with uncertainty present in standard conditioning AHST in several randomised controlled trials .In view of the fact that many high-risk AML patients do not proceed to AHST because they do not achieve a remission and considering that most of us know patients who achieved cure by AHST although they were not in remission before transplantation, the study by Davies et al (2017) is a step in the right direction. The authors demonstrate that a sequential therapy in a T-replete AHST setting is feasible, results in acceptable rates of transplantation-related mortality (which seem to be mostly relevant in the elderly proportion of the patients in this trial), low viral reactivations and without the necessity of DLI. This study demonstrates comparable survival data which have been reported in a similar setting (Schetelig et al, 2015) and therefore, instead of waiting for a second remission and thereby detouring to transplantation, revving up the engine to bypass and to transplant as soon as possible might be an advantageous approach for high-risk patients. Numerous open questions remain. The exact timing of AHST for high-risk r/r AML patients is unknown but is currently under investi...