Purpose
We systematically reviewed both pre-clinical and clinical studies on bladder chemodenervation with onabotulinumtoxin A to highlight current limitations and future drug delivery approaches.
Materials and Methods
We identified peer-reviewed basic and clinical research studies of onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A) in the treatment of neurogenic bladder and refractory idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) published between March 2000 and March 2016. Paired investigators independently screened 125 English language articles to identify controlled studies on onaBoNT-A administration in MEDLINE® database and abstracts presented at annual American Urological Association meetings. The review yielded an evidence base of over 50 articles relevant to the approach of injection free onaBoNT-A chemodenervation.
Results
The efficacy and safety of intradetrusor injection of onaBoNT-A for the treatment of OAB is sensitive to both injection volume and depth, and this issue has motivated researchers to study injection-free modes of drug delivery into the bladder. Urothelial denudation with protamine sulfate or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), liposome encapsulated onaBoNT-A, and other physical approaches are all being studied to increase toxin permeability and avoid intradetrusor injections. Liposome encapsulated onaBoNT-A enhances toxin activity while reducing its toxin degradation. The safety and efficacy of liposome encapsulated onaBoNT-A was tested in a multi-center, placebo controlled study. Although this treatment successfully reduced urinary frequency and urgency, it did not significantly reduce urgency urinary incontinence episodes.
Conclusions
Intradetrusor injection of onaBoNT-A is safe and effective as reported in several large multicenter randomized controlled trials. Injection of the toxin into the bladder wall impairs both afferent and efferent nerves, but drug delivery approaches that avoid injections impair only bladder afferent nerves. Further studies are needed to develop better drug delivery platforms that overcome the drawbacks of intradetrusor injection, increase patient acceptance, and reduce the treatment costs.