2016
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-016-0904-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability test methods and their application to AAMs: case of sulfuric-acid resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage was evident due to the removal of GP paste and the exposure of aggregates which was likely due to the dissolution of the GP paste caused by the acid attack. Cracks around the edge of GP4 were also observed which appear to indicate expansion and are similar to those observed by Aliques-Granero et al [111] in alkali activated slag mortars. These cracks are likely due to the formation of gypsum which was identified by XRD, TGA, FTIR and EDX analysis.…”
Section: Effect Of Increasing Slag Contentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The damage was evident due to the removal of GP paste and the exposure of aggregates which was likely due to the dissolution of the GP paste caused by the acid attack. Cracks around the edge of GP4 were also observed which appear to indicate expansion and are similar to those observed by Aliques-Granero et al [111] in alkali activated slag mortars. These cracks are likely due to the formation of gypsum which was identified by XRD, TGA, FTIR and EDX analysis.…”
Section: Effect Of Increasing Slag Contentsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Low-calcium alkali-activated materials (geopolymers and mortars/ concretes produced from these) have been repeatedly observed to exhibit high acid resistance [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], making them promising materials for applications in the aforementioned environments, though exceptions from this general trend, i.e. unsatisfactory or ambiguous results of acid resistance tests, have been reported too [12,[19][20][21]. Different parameters of the mix-design have been found to influence the acid resistance of geopolymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of dissolved silicate in the activator solution influences the crystallinity of the reaction products, which can impact the chemical resistance too [12]. Apparently the most important parameter is the CaO content of the binder: During sulfuric acid or sulfate attack, calcium may precipitate as gypsum, thereby causing expansion and damage [14,16,21]; under some circumstances, however, gypsum appears to block pores, inhibiting further corrosion [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Nevertheless, questions remain regarding the long-term durability of AAMs, with the underlying degradation mechanisms often founded at the atomic/nanoscale, such as carbonation-induced chemical reactions [15][16][17][18] (from atmospheric and accelerated CO 2 conditions) and sulfate attack of the binder gel. 19,20 Progress is being made to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for chemical degradation of different types of AAMs, with the aim to pinpoint which mix designs are most resistant to different forms of degradation. 16,21,22 However, microcracking remains an outstanding durability and aesthetic issue for silicate-activated slag-based AAMs, and since silicate-activated slag possesses superior setting times, 23 strength development, 23 and permeability 14 compared with other AAMs, having a fundamental scientific understanding of the underlying cause(s) of microcracking is needed together with potential solutions for minimizing/mitigating this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%