2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of Structural Health Monitoring Systems under Impact Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…History of energy data observed from the piezoelectric sensor is used to localise the different impact. In another work, Thomas et al 24 developed SHM for multiple-impact damage monitoring using piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) by means of monitoring the force history data from the sensor. Similarly, in future, the study can be carried out to detect the multiple impacts on the polymer composite by monitoring the variation history data in piezoresistive response of the coated glass fibre.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of energy data observed from the piezoelectric sensor is used to localise the different impact. In another work, Thomas et al 24 developed SHM for multiple-impact damage monitoring using piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) by means of monitoring the force history data from the sensor. Similarly, in future, the study can be carried out to detect the multiple impacts on the polymer composite by monitoring the variation history data in piezoresistive response of the coated glass fibre.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that, the authors propose an algorithm for temperature compensation based on cross correlation, where the CCD index is applied to narrow bands of frequency but covering the total analysed frequency band. Thomas and Khatibi [50] evaluated the integrity of surface mounted and embedded PWAS on carbon fibre/epoxy composites under repeated impact loading, resorting to electromechanical impedance and capacitance measurements. Both methods revealed the superior integrity of embedded PWAS.…”
Section: Piezoelectric Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, PWASs commonly face issues such as sensor cracking, soldering breakage, and a decline in piezoelectric properties with aging [ 15 ]. These concerns have been highlighted through various tests aimed at promoting degradation mechanisms on mounted and free PWASs, including impact loading [ 16 , 17 ], quasi-static and fatigue loading [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], vibration [ 19 , 21 ], pressurization (altitude) [ 19 , 20 ], radiation [ 22 , 23 , 24 ], cryogenic [ 18 , 25 , 26 ], and high-temperature cycling [ 18 , 19 , 21 , 27 ], as well as humidity and submersion in diverse fluids [ 18 , 20 ]. In all these instances, electromechanical impedance (EMI) measurements were the preferred testing method for assessing the performance of PWASs upon accrued damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%