2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of soil mix material subjected to wetting/drying cycles and external sulfate attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the alkaline activator used is mainly composed of sodium and aluminium hydroxides, while the acidic medium was obtained using sulfuric acid. Most likely, a combination of the these two factors was responsible for the formation of both superficial and internal cracks in the stabilised soil mass, leading to the premature collapse of the specimen [42,43]. hand, the formation of soluble sulphates inside this specimen is also possible, as a consequence of the interaction between the acidic medium and the composition of the cementitious 50FA50WG paste.…”
Section: Durability Of the Selected Soil-cement Combinationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, the alkaline activator used is mainly composed of sodium and aluminium hydroxides, while the acidic medium was obtained using sulfuric acid. Most likely, a combination of the these two factors was responsible for the formation of both superficial and internal cracks in the stabilised soil mass, leading to the premature collapse of the specimen [42,43]. hand, the formation of soluble sulphates inside this specimen is also possible, as a consequence of the interaction between the acidic medium and the composition of the cementitious 50FA50WG paste.…”
Section: Durability Of the Selected Soil-cement Combinationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, deionized water, 5% Na 2 SO 4 solution, 5% NaCl solution, and three dilute sulfuric acid solutions with pH values of 1.5, 3, and 5 were used as exposure solutions in this study. The drying-wetting test performed in this study was in accordance with the recommended method [11,27,28]. Firstly, the PG-based backfill specimens were dried in an oven at 40 °C for 48 h. Secondly, the specimens were submerged in different exposure solutions with a liquid/solid ratio of 5:1 for 24 h at an environment temperature of 20 °C.…”
Section: Drying-wetting Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p was the porosity of the specimen; was the saturated mass of the specimen after n cycles; and was the dry mass of the specimens after n cycles. Mass changes in the specimens The drying-wetting test performed in this study was in accordance with the recommended method [11,27,28]. Firstly, the PG-based backfill specimens were dried in an oven at 40 • C for 48 h. Secondly, the specimens were submerged in different exposure solutions with a liquid/solid ratio of 5:1 for 24 h at an environment temperature of 20 • C. The specimens were then exposed to 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 21 and 30 drying-wetting cycles, with the leachate sampled after the specified number of cycles and filtered (0.22 µm) for subsequent chemical analysis.…”
Section: Porosity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations