2019
DOI: 10.3390/coatings9010039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of Selected Transparent and Semi-Transparent Coatings on Siberian and European Larch during Artificial Weathering

Abstract: This paper compares the resistance of 20 commercial transparent and semi-transparent coatings applied to European and Siberian larch during artificial weathering in Xenotest. The change in gloss, colour, contact angle of wetting, resistance to Aspergillus niger and Penicillium brevicompactum moulds was evaluated, and visual changes at the top surface of treated wood species were measured. Overall, the durability of coatings on European larch was higher than that on Siberian larch. The most durable of the teste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of the top hydrophobic layer did not significantly improve the properties of less suitable coating systems during exposure (Figures 2-8, Table 5). In the case of oil thin layer systems, the positive effect of pigments on the overall service life and color stability (OL-8 and OL-9 -see Figures 2 and 5) was confirmed, which is consistent with other studies [28,41,42]. However, in the case of penetrating pigmented oil without the top hydrophobic layer OL-10, rapid leaching of coating and loss of functionality occurred.…”
Section: Final Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The application of the top hydrophobic layer did not significantly improve the properties of less suitable coating systems during exposure (Figures 2-8, Table 5). In the case of oil thin layer systems, the positive effect of pigments on the overall service life and color stability (OL-8 and OL-9 -see Figures 2 and 5) was confirmed, which is consistent with other studies [28,41,42]. However, in the case of penetrating pigmented oil without the top hydrophobic layer OL-10, rapid leaching of coating and loss of functionality occurred.…”
Section: Final Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, coating systems OL-10b and OL-10c were characterized by a relatively low color change ( Figure 2) and minimal decrease of contact angle ( Figure 5), but their overall visual degradation was quite pronounced (Table 5 and Figure 7). If the top layer of coating is degraded, but the penetrated layer remains, the significant visual changes occur, but the contact angle can be unaffected [8,41]. At the same time, it can be stated that coatings with better results of visual evaluation according to Table 5 (e.g.…”
Section: Visual and Microscopic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These properties are more likely connected with coating degradation and disruption than with chemical changes in wood [34,39]. Acrylate and oil coatings reached the best performance on larch wood also in study of Šimůnková et al [15]. In opposite, in the study of Sivrikaya et al [48], the better performance against atmospheric conditions on oak wood was recorded for alkyd coatings compared with other tested coatings.…”
Section: Macroscopic and Microscopic Evaluation Of The Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Their advantage is the ability to protect wood and preserve the natural look and colour [13], but they have the disadvantage of not protecting the substrate wood against UV and visible light radiation as well as pigmented coatings [14]. The different performance of coatings is also caused by their polymer base [15], the type of solvent [16] or even by the underlying wood species [17,18]. Coatings protect underlying wood, but they are exposed to weathering process causing their degradation [17,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%