1999
DOI: 10.2172/15007249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability and natural mineral studies carried out to support development of waste forms for immobilisation of plutonium interim report: April 30, 1999

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from Appendix 1 and Hart et al, 1999a. Single-phase brannerite appears to be significantly less durable than either zirconolite or pyrochlore based on the 70 o C SPFT data shown in Fig. 5c (Hart et al, 1999a). This is consistent with the MCC-1 test results of brannerite-rich multiphase ceramics (Bakel et al, 1999b) which show increased release rates of U release relative to brannerite-poor ceramics.…”
Section: Single Phase Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Data from Appendix 1 and Hart et al, 1999a. Single-phase brannerite appears to be significantly less durable than either zirconolite or pyrochlore based on the 70 o C SPFT data shown in Fig. 5c (Hart et al, 1999a). This is consistent with the MCC-1 test results of brannerite-rich multiphase ceramics (Bakel et al, 1999b) which show increased release rates of U release relative to brannerite-poor ceramics.…”
Section: Single Phase Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…No difference in durability between the pure and impure ceramic was found. Similar tests of impure ceramics containing additional Ni, Nd, Zn, La, Si, Na, Mg, Fe, Al, Cr, K, Mo, Ta, W, Sn, Ba, and P also show no measurable difference in dissolution rates (Hart et al, 1999a). These data suggest that at these levels of impurities, the added elements either: (1) fit into existing lattice sites in the major phases of the ceramic without significant destabilization; (2) form a separate, relatively durable phase that dissolves no faster than the titanate matrix; or (3) form a relatively non-durable phase that does not contain any of the actinides or neutron absorbers.…”
Section: Effects Of Impuritiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data in Figure 3.15 show that rates with respect Ca and Mo are greater than the U rate by a factor of ~10X. Recent reports show that release of Ca to solution is typically faster than rates based on other elements in the specimens (Strachan et al 2000 andHart et al 1999a). Dissolution rates based on Mo release are also faster (~10X) compared to the U release rates.…”
Section: 10mentioning
confidence: 88%