2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplications disrupt chromatin architecture and rewire GPR101-enhancer communication in X-linked acrogigantism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A general framework of approximately one causal gene per phenotype per segment is in agreement with the increased density of constrained genes we observed for pleiotropic rCNVs and comports with existing knowledge for a handful of prominent GDs, such as CRKL and TBX1 associations with kidney and heart abnormalities, respectively, in 22q11.2 GD deletions (Lindsay et al, 2001;Lopez-Rivera et al, 2017). However, the full genetic effects of most rCNVs are likely to be more complex, given the known examples of cis-regulatory effects (Franke et al, 2022), gene-gene interactions (Carvalho et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2020), and variable penetrance or expressivity due to secondary variants and polygenic background (Albers et al, 2012;Davies et al, 2020;Girirajan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A general framework of approximately one causal gene per phenotype per segment is in agreement with the increased density of constrained genes we observed for pleiotropic rCNVs and comports with existing knowledge for a handful of prominent GDs, such as CRKL and TBX1 associations with kidney and heart abnormalities, respectively, in 22q11.2 GD deletions (Lindsay et al, 2001;Lopez-Rivera et al, 2017). However, the full genetic effects of most rCNVs are likely to be more complex, given the known examples of cis-regulatory effects (Franke et al, 2022), gene-gene interactions (Carvalho et al, 2014;Singh et al, 2020), and variable penetrance or expressivity due to secondary variants and polygenic background (Albers et al, 2012;Davies et al, 2020;Girirajan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We initially identified a deleterious missense PAM variant (p.Arg703Gln) in a FIPA family with a severe form of childhood-onset pituitary gigantism in which other established causes, such as X-linked acrogigantism (X-LAG) due to duplications involving GPR101 , germline AIP mutations/deletions or others, had been ruled out [33, 34]. Among the genes filtered from the WES screening, the high level of PAM expression in the pituitary gland and its known functions in the pituitary and other endocrine cells made PAM the prioritized candidate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, deletions encompassing TAD boundaries will fuse the two adjacent TADs (TAD fusion) (Figure 4B). [63,[93][94][95][96] Duplications that include TAD boundaries will create new TADs ("neo-TAD" formation) (Figure 4C), [68,71,94,[96][97][98][99][100][101] and inversions encompassing TAD boundaries will result in the exchange of regulatory material between TADs (TAD shuffling) (Figure 4D).…”
Section: Enhancer Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%