2017
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjx021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplicated common bile duct: a recipe for biliary injury. Report of a new variant

Abstract: Duplicated common bile duct, often associated with conditions like lithiasis, biliary cysts and pancreatobiliary maljunction, could result in highly morbid and potentially fatal biliary injuries. Precise preoperative diagnosis and classification still remain a challenge. A female patient undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis sustained iatrogenic bile duct injury. A drainage tube was placed into the injured duct for post-operative conservative management. Post-opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A and B coronal and axial magnetic resonance T2-weighted image showed the low signal septum in the dilated common bile duct which divided the extrahepatic bile duct into two parts, which connected to the left and the right hepatic duct respectively. C and D coronal maximum intensity projection magnetic resonance image and volume rendering image showed the dilated and duplicated common bile duct however, none of these were classified into classification system [8][9][10][11] (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A and B coronal and axial magnetic resonance T2-weighted image showed the low signal septum in the dilated common bile duct which divided the extrahepatic bile duct into two parts, which connected to the left and the right hepatic duct respectively. C and D coronal maximum intensity projection magnetic resonance image and volume rendering image showed the dilated and duplicated common bile duct however, none of these were classified into classification system [8][9][10][11] (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B Variant described by Kosar et al [ 9 ]. C Variant described by Nuamah et al [ 10 , 11 ]. D Variant described in our report
Fig.
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%