2012
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplicate gene enrichment and expression pattern diversification in multicellularity

Abstract: The enrichment of duplicate genes, and therefore paralogs (proteins coded by duplicate genes), in multicellular versus unicellular organisms enhances genomic functional innovation. This study quantitatively examined relationships among paralog enrichment, expression pattern diversification and multicellularity, aiming to better understand genomic basis of multicellularity. Paralog abundance in specific cells was compared with those in unicellular proteomes and the whole proteomes of multicellular organisms. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (Fig. 6c ) show that, similar to what has been observed in Caenorhabditis elegans and human [ 40 ], variability in gene expression increases with the number of paralogs.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results (Fig. 6c ) show that, similar to what has been observed in Caenorhabditis elegans and human [ 40 ], variability in gene expression increases with the number of paralogs.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We downloaded the PhosphoSitePlus database (www.phosphosite.org) dataset and counted the number of unique experimentally verified substrates for each human protein kinases, revealing that human AKT1 has 215 unique substrates (45). As many other cell biology parameters (46)(47)(48)(49), the substrate count (K) of the human kinome follows the so-called scalefree distribution, i.e., P (k) ∝ K −α or log 2 (P (k) ) ∝ -α*log 2 (K), with P (K) as the portion of protein kinases with K unique substrates and α as a positive constant. This is illustrated in the linear relationship in a log-log plot (log 2 (P (k) vs. log 2 (K)) in Figure 3.…”
Section: Generation and Expression Of Mutant Akt1 Kinasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution is long known to be un-even; a small number of miRNAs target extra-ordinarily high numbers of mRNAs, and a small number of mRNAs contain extra-ordinarily high numbers of binding sites (28). Using evolutionally conserved miRNA-target relationships in the TargetScan database (11), we showed that the miRNA binding site distribution pattern can be described quantitatively by the so-called scale-free relationship (P (k) ∝ (K+a) -α , with P (K) as the number of mRNAs containing K unique binding sites; a and α positive constants) (27), which is commonly seen in many domains of biology such as regulatory networks and protein family size distribution (29)(30)(31). This is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: The Mirna Binding Site Distribution Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%