2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01435-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplex Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assays for Rapid Detection and Identification of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and Seasonal Influenza A/H1, A/H3, and B Viruses

Abstract: Reports of a novel influenza virus type A (H1N1),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14] and Discussion sections (p.14) concerning these results to clarify this point. Figures 2 and 3 also include 95% confidence intervals to minimise the risk of over-interpretation.…”
Section: Responsementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13][14] and Discussion sections (p.14) concerning these results to clarify this point. Figures 2 and 3 also include 95% confidence intervals to minimise the risk of over-interpretation.…”
Section: Responsementioning
confidence: 88%
“…All children 6-59 months of age presenting to PMH with a history of fever (by parental report) or with a measured temperature of greater than 37.5°C at [14,15]. Picornaviruses were detected using nested PCR [16] targeting the 5'UTR of the picornavirus genome with sequencing used to assist with identification of rhinoviruses and enteroviruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods currently used for detection include serological testing and immunological testing bioassays, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescent quantitative real-time PCR (3,4). The mandated blood screenings in China are serological tests for HBV surface antigens, antibodies against T. pallidum, HCV, and HIV-1 (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, culture has increased sensitivity over both RIDTs and DFAs but requires skilled technologists and specialized laboratory settings and has a long turnaround time (2 to 14 days) (17). NAAT are highly sensitive and are gradually replacing culture as the gold standard, but these tests are generally expensive; depending on the manufacturer, require highly skilled molecular technologists; and have turnaround times of up to 24 h from receipt to results (1,7,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). As a result, specimens with negative RIDTs are usually tested subsequently by more sensitive culture or molecular assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%