2021
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dupilumab for treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients living with HIV: a case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The lack of immunosuppression has been demonstrated clinically via numerous reports of administration to individuals with HIV and cancer without progression of their disease. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In addition, there are multiple reports of initial worsening of molluscum contagiosum followed by clearance, a sequence of events that is consistent with immunologic recognition of the virus. [9][10][11][12] Finally, there has been no evidence in clinical trials suggesting an increased risk for malignancy, cancer, or infection.…”
Section: Il-4 and Il-13 Blockade Is Not Immunosuppressivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The lack of immunosuppression has been demonstrated clinically via numerous reports of administration to individuals with HIV and cancer without progression of their disease. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In addition, there are multiple reports of initial worsening of molluscum contagiosum followed by clearance, a sequence of events that is consistent with immunologic recognition of the virus. [9][10][11][12] Finally, there has been no evidence in clinical trials suggesting an increased risk for malignancy, cancer, or infection.…”
Section: Il-4 and Il-13 Blockade Is Not Immunosuppressivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 2337 articles did not meet these criteria and were excluded, leaving 14 articles describing 23 cases. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] All publications were case reports (10) or case series (4). All the studies included were rated as level 4 or 5 evidence for clinical research as detailed in the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidelines.…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%