2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199757404.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duoethnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method used was duoethnography, a participatory research methodology that is designed to study a certain phenomenon through in-depth conversations with another researcher (Sawyer and Norris 2013). In reflecting on our teaching and researching in post-class recorded conversations, we aimed to develop a shared meaning making process that not only involved the English language learning needs of the women but also the process through which we came to understand the learning that was taking place in class and the power relations that were part of it (see Najar and Choi forthcoming).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used was duoethnography, a participatory research methodology that is designed to study a certain phenomenon through in-depth conversations with another researcher (Sawyer and Norris 2013). In reflecting on our teaching and researching in post-class recorded conversations, we aimed to develop a shared meaning making process that not only involved the English language learning needs of the women but also the process through which we came to understand the learning that was taking place in class and the power relations that were part of it (see Najar and Choi forthcoming).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical difference is the engagement of more than one researcher in the challenging process of exploring meaning of a phenomenon and how it changes over time through juxtaposition of the researchers' narratives (Breault, 2016). The intention of duoethnography is not to develop two narratives of similar experience, the purpose is to critically explore the tensions between the writers who have experienced a particular phenomena to arrive at multiple understandings (Grant & Radcliffe, 2015;Sawyer & Norris, 2015).…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duoethnography, a method created by Sawyer and Norris (2015), is a novel approach that allows two or more individuals to explore the meaning they make of common experiences of phenomenon. Application of this method exposes one's history as a collection of learning experiences, allowing for critical examination of how the beliefs that influence their actions were acquired, and the meanings they give to them (Norris et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that we, the authors of the paper, take personal walking experiences and close scrutiny of our collaborative walking practices as a starting point means that our research has duoand autoethnographic/biographical and confessional sensibilities (Ellis, Adams, & Bochner, 2010;Sawyer & Norris, 2012;Van Maanen, 2011). The vignettes emerge from the first two authors' (Parisa and Mads) ongoing casual interest in walking, an interest that increasingly became a reflective practice as the project went along.…”
Section: Qualities Of Walking and Non-representational Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking a cue from duo-ethnographic approaches (Sawyer & Norris, 2012), our approach emphasized the role of dialogue in surfacing and subsequently challenging and reflecting on our individual autobiographies and experiences as walkers. Rather than examining practices and recounting them in a seemingly objective fashion, our dialogical and first-person and biographical voicing intends to express some of the richness and complexities of walking experiences from within the felt practice.…”
Section: Qualities Of Walking and Non-representational Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%