2005
DOI: 10.1159/000087496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duodenopancreatectomy versus duodenum-preserving pancreatic head excision for chronic pancreatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In reply to the comment on our article Belina et al, 2005 [1], We think that the study has provided evidence and supported previous reports [2,3] about the benefi ts of surgical intervention in treating chronic pancreatitis even in advanced stages.…”
Section: Replysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In reply to the comment on our article Belina et al, 2005 [1], We think that the study has provided evidence and supported previous reports [2,3] about the benefi ts of surgical intervention in treating chronic pancreatitis even in advanced stages.…”
Section: Replysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Mixed techniques have equal pain relief and better short-term outcome than PD [229,230,293,294] while results in longterm follow-up are similar [295,296].…”
Section: S11mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Kommentar Die Pankreaskopfresektion ist bei Vorliegen eines entzündlichen Pankreaskopftumors das effektivste operative Verfahren und ist der reinen Drainageoperationen sowie endoskopischen Interventionen überlegen. Die duodenumerhaltenden Pankreaskopfresektionen sind dabei im kurzfristig und mittelfristig über einen Nachbeobachtungszeitraum von bis zu 2 Jahren der KauschWhipple'schen-Operation überlegen [377,378,381,382]. Die 3 Varianten der duodenumerhaltenden Pankreaskopfresektion sind in ihrer Behandlungseffektivität gleichwertig [383].…”
Section: Leitlinie 1187unclassified