1957
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)35791-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duodenal and Jejunal Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mucosal lesion of sprue may be spotty, a fact noted by Doniach and Shiner (1957) and by Rubin and his host (1960), but often not taken into account by others. In the same biopsy specimen (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mucosal lesion of sprue may be spotty, a fact noted by Doniach and Shiner (1957) and by Rubin and his host (1960), but often not taken into account by others. In the same biopsy specimen (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin; the epithelial height was independently graded by three observers from normal (4) to very flat (1). Another portion of the specimen was studied by the dissecting microscope, classified by the scheme of Doniach and Shiner (1957), and photographed. All slides were reviewed by at least two observers, one of whom knew nothing about the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jejunal mucosal lesion in coeliac disease is characterized by an immature and irregular absorptive epithelium and an intense inflammatory cell infiltrate consisting mainly of lymphocytes and plasma cells with loss of villous structure (Doniach & Shiner, 1957). Two main hypotheses have been suggested to explain the pathogenesis of this lesion (Booth, 1970).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The published photomicrographs are not of sufficient magnification to exclude the presence of gastric epithelium. Shiner (1957) took mucosal specimens from the duodenum by an aspiration biopsy tube; the biopsies were taken from the first or second part of the duodenum, and the histological study of them by Doniach and Shiner (1957) does not distinguish between these different sites of origin. In most of the biopsies the mucosa was normal and the epithelium well preserved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%