2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5041-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Due to great variability fixed HKS angle for alignment of the distal cut leads to a significant error in coronal TKA orientation

Abstract: The HKS angle was not constant at 7° but averaged 6°, and ranged from 2.5° to 9°. The FMA angle was on average 93° but varied more than 20°, ranging from 75° (varus) to 104° (valgus). The mean HKA ± SD was - 3.4° ± 5.7° (range - 23.0° to 15.0°). The mean HKSSD was 5.6° ± 0.9° (range 2.5°-8.8°). The mean FMASD was 92.6° ± 2.8° (range 75.2°-103.5°). The Pearson correlations of all measured angles are presented in Table 1. HKS significantly correlated negatively with HKA and FMA (p < 0.001). FMA and HKA were stro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is an urgent need for a convenient and effective method to measure HKA. Traditional HKA measurement methods [5][6][7] rely on the doctors to calculate the angle. No automatic measurement system has emerged yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is an urgent need for a convenient and effective method to measure HKA. Traditional HKA measurement methods [5][6][7] rely on the doctors to calculate the angle. No automatic measurement system has emerged yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, despite using a variable VCA, there were 15% outliers in group A, which may be due to the discrepancy between the plan and its execution. Lampart et al [ 21 ] prospectively collected computed tomography (CT) data from 1480 consecutive patients who underwent CT for 3D reconstruction before TKA and observed a variable femoral mechanical (FMA) angle. They concluded that due to greater variability of the FMA angle, the FMA angle seems more relevant than the hip-knee-shaft (HKS) angle in defining the strategy of realignment of the lower limb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study evaluated 1,480 consecutive patients with hip-knee-shaft angles ranging from 2.5°-9°, confirming the insufficiency of the aforementioned correction to AP measurements in many cases. 30 Thus, despite the high correlation between AP and full-length radiographs, there is great potential for misinterpretation of true mechanical alignment when using measurements on standard AP radiographs as proxies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%