2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3558179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Due Process in Antitrust Enforcement Through the Lens of Comparative Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AML (2008) distinguishes between two kinds of breaches, one of which is undertaken “without a valid reason” highlighted under Article 17 [57]. Although AML does not regard fault as a key determinant of a defence, a distinction can be drawn between whether the action is based on the entity’s own initiative or its passive obedience (Yoo et al , 2020). In terms of abusing a market dominant position, passive actions are perceived as less damaging to market competition than active ones (Zhou et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AML (2008) distinguishes between two kinds of breaches, one of which is undertaken “without a valid reason” highlighted under Article 17 [57]. Although AML does not regard fault as a key determinant of a defence, a distinction can be drawn between whether the action is based on the entity’s own initiative or its passive obedience (Yoo et al , 2020). In terms of abusing a market dominant position, passive actions are perceived as less damaging to market competition than active ones (Zhou et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%