2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.01076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DuDoNet: Dual Domain Network for CT Metal Artifact Reduction

Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) is an imaging modality widely used for medical diagnosis and treatment. CT images are often corrupted by undesirable artifacts when metallic implants are carried by patients, which creates the problem of metal artifact reduction (MAR). Existing methods for reducing the artifacts due to metallic implants are inadequate for two main reasons. First, metal artifacts are structured and non-local so that simple image domain enhancement approaches would not suffice. Second, the MAR approaches… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
158
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, CT metal artifact reduction (MAR) under limited-view acquisition is an important research direction. Current MAR techniques are mostly limited to fullview acquisition [41], [42]. The current state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction algorithm, such as DuDoNet [41], utilizes projection space and image space simultaneously which is similar to our CasRedSCAN design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirdly, CT metal artifact reduction (MAR) under limited-view acquisition is an important research direction. Current MAR techniques are mostly limited to fullview acquisition [41], [42]. The current state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction algorithm, such as DuDoNet [41], utilizes projection space and image space simultaneously which is similar to our CasRedSCAN design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current MAR techniques are mostly limited to fullview acquisition [41], [42]. The current state-of-the-art metal artifact reduction algorithm, such as DuDoNet [41], utilizes projection space and image space simultaneously which is similar to our CasRedSCAN design. Our CasRedSCAN could potentially integrated with current MAR network for MAR under limited view conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These images are implanted with metals and are projected onto CT sinograms using the FP algorithm; the attenuation coefficient of the implanted metals is set to 7.874 according to the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) standard. Metal‐corrupted CT sinograms are synthesized using the dynamic wavelet thresholding method for x‐ray CT metal artifact reduction by Peng et al 19 and the dual domain network method for CT metal artifact reduction by Lin et al 31 In addition, to test the clinical efficacy of the proposed method, we evaluate it on a real clinical data (a CT image that contains real metal artifacts), which is shared by the authors of another MAR study 9 . The size of the clinical CT image is 512 × 512.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current DL‐based MAR methods mainly seek to patch metal trace in corrupted sinograms, and then use filtered back‐projection (FBP) 24,25 to reconstruct the patched sinograms to CT images. For example, Ghani et al 26 used a ten‐layer fully convolutional network (FCN) 27 to patch metal trace; Park et al 28 used a U‐Net 29 like network to reduce metal artifacts; Zhang et al 30 proposed a multistep convolutional neural network (MSCNN) for MAR, and used an FCN to patch metal trace followed by a postprocessing step to suppress secondary artifacts; Lin et al 31 applied a U‐Net–like network to patch metal trace and employed the network for metal trace inpainting to reduce secondary artifacts. These DL‐based metal trace inpainting methods aimed to reduce more artifacts and incur less secondary artifacts than traditional sinogram restoration methods due to their better detail recovering capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] introduces a 3D inpainting task to improve the performance of ultrasound image segmentation. [23,25] convert the metal artifact reduction problem to the X-ray image inpainting problem and the metal artifacts are removed by reconstructing from the inpainted X-ray images.…”
Section: Semantic Inpaintingmentioning
confidence: 99%