2016
DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2015.1136969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ductility Sensitivity to Stacking Fault Energy and Grain Size in Cu–Al Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Materials with higher stacking fault energy are more resistant to defect formation. An increased stacking fault energy indicates materials which are less ductile (or more brittle) and thus are most susceptible to dissolution by particle fracture (i.e., rather than stacking fault initiation), which is facilitated by the rapid vibration of stimulation at the resonance frequency. This is further validated by the inverse linear correlation between the megasonic ratio and indentation modulus-to-hardness (M I /H) ratio in Figure c, the latter of which serves as a proxy for the ductility of a material (since the M I /H ratio corresponds to the inverse of a yield strain). Note that here, the indentation modulus was calculated based on the simulated stiffness using data from the MD simulations, while hardness was obtained from microindentation tests in the literature .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materials with higher stacking fault energy are more resistant to defect formation. An increased stacking fault energy indicates materials which are less ductile (or more brittle) and thus are most susceptible to dissolution by particle fracture (i.e., rather than stacking fault initiation), which is facilitated by the rapid vibration of stimulation at the resonance frequency. This is further validated by the inverse linear correlation between the megasonic ratio and indentation modulus-to-hardness (M I /H) ratio in Figure c, the latter of which serves as a proxy for the ductility of a material (since the M I /H ratio corresponds to the inverse of a yield strain). Note that here, the indentation modulus was calculated based on the simulated stiffness using data from the MD simulations, while hardness was obtained from microindentation tests in the literature .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Cu–Al alloys, the previous investigations have revealed that the deformation mechanisms transfer from wavy slip to planar slip and twinning as SFE decreases via Al addition. Furthermore, superior balance of strength and ductility can be achieved by decreasing SFE . Apart from alloying effect, temperature is another important factor that impacts on SFE .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For metallic materials with face‐centered cubic (FCC) structure, the dislocation activity is sensitive to the stacking fault energy (SFE) and temperature . In this work, the mechanical behaviors of cold‐rolled (CR) and partially recrystallized (PRX) Cu–Al alloys were tested at 293 and 77 K, and mechanisms for mechanical property optimization were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high-SFE metals with a FCC structure, the work hardening rate continuously decreases with the increase of strain, which is ascribed to the operation of cross-slip process as a dynamic recovery mechanism. [207][208][209] However, a typical work hardening rate recovery phenomenon can be found in low SFE metals, in which the work hardening rate keeps almost constant or increases with strain, [210][211][212] showing an improvement in the work hardening capacity. Consequently, a good strength-ductility match usually can be achieved in low SFE FCC metals rather than high SFE ones.…”
Section: Lowering the Stacking Fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%