2004
DOI: 10.1353/bhm.2004.0115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dubious Equalities and Embodied Differences: Cultural Studies on Cosmetic Surgery (review)

Abstract: Kathy Davis continues to explore the practices and meanings of cosmetic surgery, extending but also defending her 1995 book, Reshaping the Female Body. In her introduction, she addresses Susan Bordo's published criticism of her views. Bordo finds Davis too willing to accept cosmetic surgery as an expression of female agency. Engaging with such criticism highlights substantive issues long raised by feminists (at the least, since the 1968 Miss America protest) about the cultural practices and performances of fem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intention of developing this intervention is not to forbid women from managing their appearance, but to help them to reflect on whether cosmetic surgery is a necessity and to, at least, make them feel it is not necessary to medically modify their otherwise healthy body (Henderson-King & Brooks, 2009). From the perspective of feminist psychology, some frameworks view appearance enhancement via cosmetic surgery as a means to empower women to seize control of their lives in an appearance-focused society and to improve their sense of self and (social) capital (Davis, 2003;Heggenstaller et al, 2018). At the same time, other frameworks, including objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), would argue that selfworth and capital that is gained via appearance requires constant and substantial investment and is ultimately fleeting, and thus does not offer women true power and equity; it may also serve to uphold systems of gender inequity and the societal objectification of girls and women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intention of developing this intervention is not to forbid women from managing their appearance, but to help them to reflect on whether cosmetic surgery is a necessity and to, at least, make them feel it is not necessary to medically modify their otherwise healthy body (Henderson-King & Brooks, 2009). From the perspective of feminist psychology, some frameworks view appearance enhancement via cosmetic surgery as a means to empower women to seize control of their lives in an appearance-focused society and to improve their sense of self and (social) capital (Davis, 2003;Heggenstaller et al, 2018). At the same time, other frameworks, including objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997), would argue that selfworth and capital that is gained via appearance requires constant and substantial investment and is ultimately fleeting, and thus does not offer women true power and equity; it may also serve to uphold systems of gender inequity and the societal objectification of girls and women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to this double-edged sword, the novel can be seen to be embracing both standpoints. Researchers such as Susie Orbach (1978), Naomi Wolf (1991, Susan Bordo (1993), Sander L. Gilman (1999), and Kathy Davis (1991Davis ( , 1997Davis ( , 1999Davis ( , 2003 all consider different aspects of the connection between body and femininity. The first of these, Susie Orbach, wrote Fat is a Feminist Issue in 1978, which is close to the date of publication of Weldon's novel.…”
Section: Beauty And/or Pain: Liberation or Captivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers have used Butler's concept of agency, but they differ in their application. While examining women's cosmetic surgery practices, Davis (2003) incorporated the concept of agency into the analysis to emphasize that "individuals can actively participate in the composition of social life." However, as Nishikura (2005) pointed out, while Davis emphasized women as actors with the capacity to make decisions, the concept of agency was attributed to women only as actors.…”
Section: Previous Research and Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%