2014
DOI: 10.1090/conm/613/12237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dualizability in Low-Dimensional Higher Category Theory

Abstract: Abstract. These lecture notes form an expanded account of a course given at the Summer School on Topology and Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we show that the Serre automorphism is actually a pseudo-natural transformation of the identity functor on the maximal subgroupoid of C, as suggested in [Sch13]. To the best of our knowledge, a proof of this statement has not appeared in the literature so far, hence we illustrate the details in the following.…”
Section: Definition 23 An Object X In a Symmetric Monoidal Bicategory...mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Next, we show that the Serre automorphism is actually a pseudo-natural transformation of the identity functor on the maximal subgroupoid of C, as suggested in [Sch13]. To the best of our knowledge, a proof of this statement has not appeared in the literature so far, hence we illustrate the details in the following.…”
Section: Definition 23 An Object X In a Symmetric Monoidal Bicategory...mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…When talking about colimits we always mean the appropriate higher categorical concept, for example for d = 2 we mean what is usually called a pseudolimit [JY21, Chapter 5]. The general definition of a fully dualisable will not matter much for us and hence we refer to any of the following references for it [Lur09,GS18,SP14]. The second point implies that the category of framed d-dimensional fully extended topological field theories with values in C is equivalent to the core of the full subcategory on all fully dualisable objects C f.d.…”
Section: The Cobordism Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof Equations (5.2) and (5.3) are the statement that scriptCfalse(T,Pfalse)$\mathcal {C}(T,P)$ and scriptC(T̂,NP){0,nm2}$\mathcal {C}(\widehat{T},N-P)\lbrace 0,\tfrac{n-m}{2}\rbrace$ are dual 1‐morphisms in the bicategory of Z$\mathbb {Z}$‐algebras, chain complexes of bimodules, and homotopy classes of chain maps [33, Definition 6.1]. Since scriptCfalse(T,Pfalse)$\mathcal {C}(T,P)$ and RHomscriptCfalse(mfalse)(Cfalse(T,Pfalse),Cfalse(mfalse))$\operatorname{RHom}_{\mathcal {C}(m)}(\mathcal {C}(T,P),\mathcal {C}(m))$ are also a dual pair, the result follows from (the proof of) uniqueness of the dual of a dualizable 1‐morphism (essentially [10, Proposition 2.10.5], for instance).…”
Section: Duality Properties Of Khovanov's Tangle Invariants and Their...mentioning
confidence: 99%