2021
DOI: 10.1002/jgt.22781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duality theorems for stars and combs III: Undominated combs

Abstract: In a series of four papers we determine structures whose existence is dual, in the sense of complementary, to the existence of stars or combs. Here, in the third paper of the series, we present duality theorems for a combination of stars and combs: undominated combs. We describe their complementary structures in terms of rayless trees and of tree-decompositions. Applications include a complete characterisation, in terms of normal spanning trees, of the graphs whose rays are dominated but which have no rayless … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we prove that for every normally traceable graph G $G$, having a rayless spanning tree is equivalent to all the ends of G $G$ being dominated. Our proof builds on the following theorem from the third paper of the star‐comb series [2–5] that hides a six page argument:…”
Section: Rayless Spanning Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we prove that for every normally traceable graph G $G$, having a rayless spanning tree is equivalent to all the ends of G $G$ being dominated. Our proof builds on the following theorem from the third paper of the star‐comb series [2–5] that hides a six page argument:…”
Section: Rayless Spanning Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An end of G $G$ is dominated if one (equivalently: each) of its rays is dominated, see [6]. For a connected graph G $G$, having a rayless spanning tree is equivalent to all the ends of G $G$ being dominated if G $G$ is normally spanned [4] or if G $G$ does not contain a subdivision of T1 ${T}_{{\aleph }_{1}}$ [12]. Our second main result extends these results, and any T1 ${T}_{{\aleph }_{1}}$ with all tops witnesses that this extension is proper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dominating star in a graph G then is a subdivided star SG that dominates some comb CG; and a dominated comb in G is a comb CG that is dominated by some subdivided star SG. In the remaining three papers [1–3] of this series we shall find complementary structures to the existence of these substructures (again, with respect to some fixed set U).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of four papers we determine structures whose existence is complementary to the existence of two substructures that are particularly fundamental to the study of connectedness in infinite graphs: stars and combs. See [3] for a comprehensive introduction, and a brief overview of results, for the entire series of four papers ([3,1,2] and this paper).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%