2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-010-9711-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duality and Exact Penalization for General Augmented Lagrangians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…r ≥ 0, and r(λ) = 1 + |λ| for any λ ∈ Λ. Therefore r(λ) > r(0) for any λ = 0, where r(0) is, in fact, the least exact penalty parameter of the ℓ 1 penalty function for the problem (8).…”
Section: Reduction To Exact Penalty Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…r ≥ 0, and r(λ) = 1 + |λ| for any λ ∈ Λ. Therefore r(λ) > r(0) for any λ = 0, where r(0) is, in fact, the least exact penalty parameter of the ℓ 1 penalty function for the problem (8).…”
Section: Reduction To Exact Penalty Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Proof. Our aim is to apply the localization principle in the parametric form to the separating function (14). To this end, define G(·) = (g 1 (·), .…”
Section: Example Iii: Continuously Differentiable Exact Penalty Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual problem generated by such Lagrangians as in (1) is a (nondifferentiable) convex problem, which is usually solved by nonsmooth convex optimization techniques, such as subgradient methods and their extensions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%