2005
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dualité et comparaison pour les complexes de de Rham logarithmiques par rapport aux diviseurs libres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…f = (xz + y)(x 4 + y 5 + xy 4 ) (see [8]). In [5] the authors prove that the divisor defined by f in A 3 C is not of Spencer type. …”
Section: Remark 22 If Annmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…f = (xz + y)(x 4 + y 5 + xy 4 ) (see [8]). In [5] the authors prove that the divisor defined by f in A 3 C is not of Spencer type. …”
Section: Remark 22 If Annmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ucha-Enríquez began work on this problem in [10] & [11], and they obtained a characterization for free divisors of Spencer type [12]. For a general free divisor, we have the following generalization 6 due to F.J. Calderón-Moreno and L. Narváez-Macarro [8]:…”
Section: A Differential Characterization Of Lct(d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the complex Ω x 2 )(x 1 + x 2 x 3 ) = 0 is free but not of Spencer type (see [8], §5).…”
Section: Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations