2020
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.134343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-wavelength photo-killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the combination of blue light at 460 and 405 nm was reported to be effective against blue light-tolerant S. aureus . Leanse et al [ 254 ] revealed that blue light at 460 nm (90–360 J/cm 2 ) inactivated staphyloxanthin (a ROS scavenger; antioxidant) through photolysis and thus disrupted the ability of S. aureus to resist blue light treatment. Subsequent treatment with blue light at 405 nm (90–180 J/cm 2 ) inactivated the bacteria (planktonic or in biofilm) at a higher rate than when single wavelengths were used, albeit inactivation was dependent on the dosage of both 405- and 460-nm blue light.…”
Section: Blue Light Versus Antimicrobial Resistance and Consequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the combination of blue light at 460 and 405 nm was reported to be effective against blue light-tolerant S. aureus . Leanse et al [ 254 ] revealed that blue light at 460 nm (90–360 J/cm 2 ) inactivated staphyloxanthin (a ROS scavenger; antioxidant) through photolysis and thus disrupted the ability of S. aureus to resist blue light treatment. Subsequent treatment with blue light at 405 nm (90–180 J/cm 2 ) inactivated the bacteria (planktonic or in biofilm) at a higher rate than when single wavelengths were used, albeit inactivation was dependent on the dosage of both 405- and 460-nm blue light.…”
Section: Blue Light Versus Antimicrobial Resistance and Consequencmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the 460 nm light was proposed to inactivate an oxygen quencher staphyloxanthin from the cell surface, which showed a protective action against 405 nm aBL exposure. [30]. Another dual-light approach was conducted by Guffrey et al, wherein the effect of a combination of 405 nm blue light and 880 nm infrared light on S. aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the important role of porphyrin and flavin sensitizers in the realization of the biological effect of light in the blue spectral region was previously established for microbial cells (48,100). At the same time, in recent years, the antimicrobial effect of optical radiation in the blue spectral region through photolysis of the membrane-bound carotenoid pigment, staphyloxanthin (101)(102)(103), has been actively studied. The specified pigment is a triterpenoid, C30-carotenoid and is produced by Staphylococcus aureus including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).…”
Section: •-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is characterized by a wide absorption spectrum in the blue-green region (from 370 to 530 nm) with a maximum at 463 nm and a pronounced shoulder at 490 nm. It is believed (104) that this pigment is an antioxidant (singlet oxygen quencher) and, when exposed to light corresponding to its absorption band, it is prone to photolysis, which directly leads to photoinactivation of MRSA (101)(102)(103). To our knowledge, the possible role of photolysis of pigments with antioxidant properties in the regulatory effect of light on animal sperm has not been discussed in the literature.…”
Section: •-mentioning
confidence: 99%