2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-011-9156-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Toll Pricing for Hazardous Materials Transport with Linear Delay

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a dual toll pricing method to mitigate risk of hazardous materials (hazmat) transportation. We aim to simultaneously control both regular and hazmat vehicles to reduce the risk. In our model, we incorporate a new risk measure to consider durationpopulation-frequency of hazmat exposure. We first formulate the model as a Mathematical Program with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC). Then we decompose the MPEC formulation into first-stage and second-stage problems. Separate methods are develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to understand the impact of the dual toll pricing policy on hazmat risk and travel time (delay), we compare the performance with the minimum travel cost of regular traffic (v so ) and the minimum risk flow of hazmat traffic (u so ) given the regular traffic (v so ). For further validation of the proposed approach, we adopt the same metrics used by Wang et al (2011). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to understand the impact of the dual toll pricing policy on hazmat risk and travel time (delay), we compare the performance with the minimum travel cost of regular traffic (v so ) and the minimum risk flow of hazmat traffic (u so ) given the regular traffic (v so ). For further validation of the proposed approach, we adopt the same metrics used by Wang et al (2011). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main limitation of the ND policy is not to consider the carriers' priorities such as a travel cost and wastes the usability of certain road segments. Moreover, only restricting certain road segments sometimes cannot rationally adjust the hazmat flows to areas with less risk (Wang et al 2011).…”
Section: Kim Mungle and Sonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note though, that as far as applications to general motor vehicles are concerned, the global hazmat transportation problem is not particularly transferable, as the primary reason to consider a risk equity criterion is related to considerable change in risk exposure of the communities due to relatively heavy hazmat traffic. Furthermore, for obvious reasons, we will also not consider the policy-making literature discussing important decisions such as (a) road segments closure [29], (b) toll-setting [30][31][32][33], (c) locating waste treatment centers in safe sites [34][35][36][37][38], (d) locating hazmat emergency response teams [39][40][41], etc.…”
Section: Background: Hazmat Trucking Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Wang et al (2012) propose a model assuming that both hazmat traffic and regular traffic affect population safety, since congestion increases delay and then accident probabilities. The idea is to control both regular and hazmat traffic via toll setting.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%