1996
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.1996.10778464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Relationships in Academia: Dilemmas for Social Work Educators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relational role confiicts A second area of conflict came in the complicating demands of negotiating different types of relationships with students. This is simflar to Congress' (1996) discussion of dual relationships and. in particular, her description of the dual role of friend or, as the instructor's journal describes it, as "peer": I asked myself.…”
Section: Instructor Experiences Of Role Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relational role confiicts A second area of conflict came in the complicating demands of negotiating different types of relationships with students. This is simflar to Congress' (1996) discussion of dual relationships and. in particular, her description of the dual role of friend or, as the instructor's journal describes it, as "peer": I asked myself.…”
Section: Instructor Experiences Of Role Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…More recently. Congress' research has focused on dual relationships in social work education and has brought to light the ethical dilemmas faced by social work instructors as they relate to their students in four ways: as a sexual partner, as a friend, as a therapist, and as an employer (Congress. 1996(Congress.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Professors representing a variety of academic disciplines, such as higher education studies, psychology, social work, and seminary or theological training, have expressed concern regarding faculty-student sexual relationships (Ashby & Hepokoski, 2002;Congress, 1996Congress, , 2001Glaser & Thorpe, 1986;Zakrzewski, 2006). Although psychologists, teacher educators, and social workers maintain professional codes of ethics that advise professionals to avoid sexual relationships with students because of the risk of exploitation, professionals in each of these fields have expressed concerns related to consensual faculty-student sexual relationships (Barnett-Queen, 2000;Congress, 1996Congress, , 2001Lamb, Catanzaro, & Moorman, 2004). Regarding contemporary theological education, Ashby and Hepokoski (2002) stated that because seminary professors are expected to offer spiritual and personal guidance, they are likely to cross traditional faculty-student boundaries.…”
Section: Prevalence and Consequences Of Faculty-student Sexual Relatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Should faculty change grades or class policies when presented with a compelling student request (Anderson, 2001;Markie, 1994)? Can the dual relationships of mentor/instructor or employer/supervisor/instructor be free of boundary challenges (Congress, 1996)? Are consensual sexual relationships with students necessarily ill advised (Cahn, 1986;Stamler & Stone, 1998)?…”
Section: Content and Resources For Teaching Circlesmentioning
confidence: 99%