During infection, positive-strand RNA viruses subvert cellular machinery involved in RNA metabolism to translate viral proteins and replicate viral genomes to avoid or disable the host defense mechanisms. Cytoplasmic RNA granules modulate the stabilities of cellular and viral RNAs. Understanding how hepatitis C virus and other flaviviruses interact with the host machinery required for protein synthesis, localization, and degradation of mRNAs is important for elucidating how these processes occur in both virus-infected and uninfected cells.T he life of a newly synthesized mRNA would be aimless in the absence of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and microRNAs. These interactions and the formation of ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs) direct mRNAs from the nucleus to the cytoplasm for translation or to RNA granules for storage and/or degradation (1). To the benefit or detriment of a virus, viral RNA is equally exposed to such fates. From the time that a virus binds and enters a host cell, the virus interfaces with and frequently subverts different host mRNA metabolism pathways. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a master of such mechanisms, efficiently co-opting the cellular translation machinery, the microRNA pathway, and components associated with mRNA storage and decay.The single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome of HCV encodes a single open reading frame. Untranslated regions (UTRs) at the 5= and 3= ends of the genome are highly structured and contain elements that are essential for translation and replication (2). The 5= UTR contains an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) that directly recruits the 40S ribosome and a subset of initiation factors for polyprotein synthesis. Additionally, the liver-specific microRNA miR-122 interacts with two binding sites in the 5= UTR to maintain viral RNA abundance (3). miR-122 was first shown to modestly affect translation and replication (3). However, the most exciting function described for miR-122 was that of shielding the 5= UTR from degradation by the 5=-to-3= exonucleases Xrn1 and Xrn2, thereby increasing the stability of the viral RNA (3). More recently, miR-122 was proposed to facilitate the transition between translation and replication (4), a step that is poorly understood in the life of many viruses. Interestingly, recent work has shown that miR-122 abundance or single point mutations within the miR-122 binding sites facilitate HCV replication independently of miR-122 (5, 6). Many intriguing questions regarding the HCV-miR-122 interaction remain. Although we know that miR-122 must occupy both binding sites to maintain viral RNA abundance, do the sites act independently and synergistically? Does miR-122 binding alter viral RNA structure to affect gene expression, and which RNPs are associated with the miR-122 binding sites? In miR-122-independent gene expression, are the same RNP complexes associated with the HCV 5= UTR, and how are the different phases in the infectious cycle affected? Translation, localization, storage, or destruction of mRNAs is directed by specific RBPs and ...