Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.2969724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Polarized Metal-Flare Sliced Notch Antenna Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collins 17 has developed a modular BAVA array operating from 2.5 GHz to 18 GHz with U‐shaped metallic channels. A metal‐flare sliced notch antenna array has been designed by Rick, 18 which has matching from 2.6 to 21.2 GHz. Mohamed has researched a thinned all‐metal Vivaldi phased array operating over 10–35 GHz 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins 17 has developed a modular BAVA array operating from 2.5 GHz to 18 GHz with U‐shaped metallic channels. A metal‐flare sliced notch antenna array has been designed by Rick, 18 which has matching from 2.6 to 21.2 GHz. Mohamed has researched a thinned all‐metal Vivaldi phased array operating over 10–35 GHz 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vivaldi phased array antenna [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] is well-known for its wide impedance bandwidth, wide scanning range, and easy fabrication. Despite the advantages, Vivaldi arrays usually suffer from high profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve a more than 5:1 bandwidth, the profile is usually more than 0.3λ Low . [8][9][10][11][12] Recently, some new types of Vivaldi antennas with lower profiles are proposed, such as the antipodal Vivaldi antenna (AVA) and the balanced antipodal Vivaldi antenna (BAVA). [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] However, these proposed arrays also have some shortcomings, such as the narrow bandwidth (<5:1) caused by the parasitic modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all these improvements, low-profile TCDA still exhibits less bandwidth as compared to tapered slot arrays unless resistive loading is used the aperture efficiency is reduced [13]. Notably, TCDAs have better polarization purity and much lower profile, but recent works are considering reducing cross-polarization on tapered slot arrays [14]- [16]. To further increase TCDA bandwidth, previous designs incorporated uniform resistive FSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%