2014
DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2014.15.2.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Plane Augmentation Genioplasty Using Gore-Tex Chin Implants

Abstract: BackgroundThe chin shape and position is important in determining the general shape of the face, and augmentation genioplasty is performed alone or in combination with other aesthetic procedures. However, augmentation genioplasty using osteotomy is an invasive and complex procedure with the potential to damage mentalis muscle and mental nerve, to affect chin growth, and prolonged recovery. Our aim was to present our experience with a modified augmentation genioplasty procedure for hypoplastic chins using a Gor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designs –a–d possessed two statistically unique pore spacings (a,b = 151 ± 50 μm and c,d = 229 ± 51 μm) and pore sizes (a,c = 635 ± 51 μm and b,d = 1,160 ± 64 μm) to enable independent evaluation of pore spacing and size effects on material properties and in vivo responses (statistical analysis of pore size and spacing described in Appendix, Table S7). Other designs served as nonporous or microporous controls: non laser‐ablated PCL‐based SMPs (Design e) and a ~6 × 8 × 0.64 mm 3 piece of commercially available Standard Wall GORETEX tubing comprised of ePTFE with 10–30 μm‐sized micropores (Design f) (Table 2, Figure 2) (Kim, Lim, Park, & Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designs –a–d possessed two statistically unique pore spacings (a,b = 151 ± 50 μm and c,d = 229 ± 51 μm) and pore sizes (a,c = 635 ± 51 μm and b,d = 1,160 ± 64 μm) to enable independent evaluation of pore spacing and size effects on material properties and in vivo responses (statistical analysis of pore size and spacing described in Appendix, Table S7). Other designs served as nonporous or microporous controls: non laser‐ablated PCL‐based SMPs (Design e) and a ~6 × 8 × 0.64 mm 3 piece of commercially available Standard Wall GORETEX tubing comprised of ePTFE with 10–30 μm‐sized micropores (Design f) (Table 2, Figure 2) (Kim, Lim, Park, & Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gore-Tex ® is an excellent implant for chin augmentation, especially using the dual plane Gore-Tex ® chin augmentation procedure 35 .…”
Section: Mersilene ® (High Density Polyethylene)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mersilene (polyethylene terephthalate) is used for volume correction in nasal reconstruction; though it cannot be used for structural support [44]. Gore-tex is most frequently used for chin augmentation [45], for dorsum nasi or lateral walls augmentation, premaxillary graft, lobule or supralobule [42]. Polypropylene is an affordable synthetic material, easy to implant, with a wide availability and flexibility, being found in different and numerous forms.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%