2020
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202002188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual pH/ROS‐Responsive Nanoplatform with Deep Tumor Penetration and Self‐Amplified Drug Release for Enhancing Tumor Chemotherapeutic Efficacy

Abstract: Poor deep tumor penetration and incomplete intracellular drug release remain challenges for antitumor nanomedicine application in clinical settings. Herein, a nanomedicine (RLPA‐NPs) is developed that can achieve prolonged blood circulation, deep tumor penetration, active‐targeting of cancer cells, endosome/lysosome escape, and intracellular selectivity self‐amplified drug release for effective drug delivery. The RLPA‐NPs are constructed by encapsulation of a pH‐sensitive polymer octadecylamine‐poly(aspartate‐… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, most nanocarriers enter the tumor site via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [ 63 ], but it’s difficult for them to penetrate deeper into the tumor tissues due to the complex tumor microenvironment (e.g., solid extracellular matrix, tight cell packing density and high interstitial flow pressure) [ 64 ], which further attenuates the therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, a variety of strategies have been reported to promote the permeation of nanocarriers including synthesis of small size or size shrinkable nanocarriers [ 65 ] and assembling nanocarriers with the tumor-penetrating cyclic peptide (e.g., iRGD) [ 64 ]. In this study, 3D tumor spheroid models were employed to assess the penetration ability of 3BP@PLGA-IR780 in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, most nanocarriers enter the tumor site via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [ 63 ], but it’s difficult for them to penetrate deeper into the tumor tissues due to the complex tumor microenvironment (e.g., solid extracellular matrix, tight cell packing density and high interstitial flow pressure) [ 64 ], which further attenuates the therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, a variety of strategies have been reported to promote the permeation of nanocarriers including synthesis of small size or size shrinkable nanocarriers [ 65 ] and assembling nanocarriers with the tumor-penetrating cyclic peptide (e.g., iRGD) [ 64 ]. In this study, 3D tumor spheroid models were employed to assess the penetration ability of 3BP@PLGA-IR780 in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ability ensures that the nanoparticles are more effective at the site of the tumor with lower pH and less damage to normal tissue. [52] Besides, the whole release process lasted for nearly 5 days, which guaranteed the long-term effect of the HMME.…”
Section: Hmme Sustained Release From Zdh Nanoparticles and In Vitro Degradation Behaviors Of Qh/zdh Cryogelmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Among endogenous stimuli, such as low pH, enzymes, and glutathione (GSH), 14 ROS is the most promising one for comprehensive construction of responsive linkers due to its overproduction in tumor cells (10 times higher than normal cells). 15 Recently, ROS-responsive linkers, including thioether, thioketal, alkylene sulfide, selenium/tellurium, boronic ester, peroxalate ester, and polyproline, have been extensively developed. [16][17][18] Chu et al reported a ROS-responsive camptothecin (CPT) prodrug delivery system via a thioketal linker for co-delivery of photosensitizer pyropheophorbide-a (PPa) and chemodrug CPT, which could achieve on-demand CPT release.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%