2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual pH/reduction-responsive hybrid polymeric micelles for targeted chemo-photothermal combination therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason is insufficient drug release that involves a high local accumulation of DDSs that cannot convert into effective drug levels in the target sites. This calls for a new and effective approach that improves drug release in cancer cells in response to certain continuous stimuli . In addition, the poor tumor penetration of DDSs is another cause for their disappointing therapeutic efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is insufficient drug release that involves a high local accumulation of DDSs that cannot convert into effective drug levels in the target sites. This calls for a new and effective approach that improves drug release in cancer cells in response to certain continuous stimuli . In addition, the poor tumor penetration of DDSs is another cause for their disappointing therapeutic efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stimuli may be endogenous or exogenous or a combination of both. For instance, Zhang et al [95] reported pH and redox (dual endogenous stimuli) responsive micelles for tumor targeting. They synthesized copolymers based on poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) by disulfide (PCL-ss-PEG-ss-PCL) and acetal (PCL-acetal-PEG) linkages and their mixture was used to fabricate dual responsive micelles.…”
Section: Dual/multi-responsive Ddsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were sacrificed at 24 h post-injection and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, and tumor) harvested for ex vivo imaging and semi-quantitative biodistribution analysis. [23][24][25]…”
Section: In Vivo Biodistribution Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%