1972
DOI: 10.2307/1769380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Perspective: Free Indirect Discourse and Related Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite a few studies do not distinguish free indirect thought from free indirect speech, and use free indirect speech (sometimes free indirect style) as a generic term, under which FIT is in effect a subcategory (e.g., Fludernik,1993;Sotirova, 2004). Hernadi (1972) might be the first to draw a distinction between speech and thought, and contends that mental activities in characters' minds comprise "quasi-verbal" (p. 39) contents of the imaginative worlds literary works evoke. That is to say, whereas speech and perception constitute verbal and nonverbal components of the worlds, the presentation of thought, be it conscious or not, indicates the presence of operations similar to but not the same as verbal communication in human mind.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few studies do not distinguish free indirect thought from free indirect speech, and use free indirect speech (sometimes free indirect style) as a generic term, under which FIT is in effect a subcategory (e.g., Fludernik,1993;Sotirova, 2004). Hernadi (1972) might be the first to draw a distinction between speech and thought, and contends that mental activities in characters' minds comprise "quasi-verbal" (p. 39) contents of the imaginative worlds literary works evoke. That is to say, whereas speech and perception constitute verbal and nonverbal components of the worlds, the presentation of thought, be it conscious or not, indicates the presence of operations similar to but not the same as verbal communication in human mind.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literary works, however, have been an ever fresh subject for the study of thought presentation, and there are theories (e.g. Chatman, 1978;Fludernik, 1993Fludernik, , 2005Genette, 1980;Hernadi, 1972;McHale, 1978McHale, , 2009Leech &Short, 1981;Page, 1988Page, [1973; Toolan, 2008Toolan, [1996) founded with textual support from renowned authors of novels and short stories. The stylistic study of thought presentation is concerned with its effect on the reader and how the effect is manipulated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers usually study thought presentation along a continuum depending on whether the narrator or the character is speaking or both are speaking and a few scalar models have been proposed. Hernadi (1972) might be the first to develop a tripartite scheme consisting of direct, indirect and free indirect speech and thought, with three subcategories of free indirect style identified. Though categories other than these main categories remained unexplained, he perceptively distinguished thought from speech, which used to fall under the generic term speech.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scholars have identified a number of features of NP (Banfield, 1981; Brinton, 1980; Fehr, 1938; Fludernik, 1993: 305–309; Hernadi, 1972). Most of these features are not exclusive to the technique, and not all of them occur in every instance.…”
Section: Introduction: ‘Narrated Perception’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. NP has also received other names: ‘substitutionary perception’ (Fehr, 1938; Hernadi, 1972; McHale, 1978: 280), ‘represented perception’ (Banfield, 1981; Brinton, 1980) and ‘free indirect perception’ (Chatman, 1978: 204; Palmer, 2004: 48). The term ‘narrated perception’ (Cohn, 1978: 111, 133–134; Fludernik, 1993: 305–309) is adopted throughout this work because it does not define the technique in relation to free indirect discourse and also captures the closeness between perception and pure narration. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%