2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00373.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual origins of social parasitism in North American Dialictus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) confirmed using a phylogenetic approach

Abstract: The bee subgenus Dialictus (Halictidae: Lasioglossum) displays a large array of behaviours including solitary behaviour, eusociality, and social parasitism. Socially parasitic Dialictus share a suite of morphological traits; these could result from shared ancestry, but given their functional significance, could also have resulted from adaptive convergence. A combined morphological and molecular phylogenetic approach was used to test for monophyly of North American socially parasitic Dialictus. Two data sets we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(132 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation, together with the pathway presented above, may help explain the conspicuous discrepancy concerning the appearance of cleptoparasitic lineages among bee families (Wcislo ). Our results, together with those of Cardinal et al (), indicate nine or 10 independent origins of cleptoparasitism in the bee families Megachilidae and Apidae; nine additional origins are posited in the subfamily Halictinae, although some of these origins may in fact represent social parasites and not cleptoparasites (Michener ; Gibbs et al ). Yet there are no confirmed cleptoparasitic lineages in the families Andrenidae, Colletidae, and Melittidae, nor in the halictid subfamilies Nomiinae and Rophitinae (although see Daly and Magnacca [] regarding purported cleptoparasitism in the colletid subgenus Hylaeus [ Nesoprosopis ]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This observation, together with the pathway presented above, may help explain the conspicuous discrepancy concerning the appearance of cleptoparasitic lineages among bee families (Wcislo ). Our results, together with those of Cardinal et al (), indicate nine or 10 independent origins of cleptoparasitism in the bee families Megachilidae and Apidae; nine additional origins are posited in the subfamily Halictinae, although some of these origins may in fact represent social parasites and not cleptoparasites (Michener ; Gibbs et al ). Yet there are no confirmed cleptoparasitic lineages in the families Andrenidae, Colletidae, and Melittidae, nor in the halictid subfamilies Nomiinae and Rophitinae (although see Daly and Magnacca [] regarding purported cleptoparasitism in the colletid subgenus Hylaeus [ Nesoprosopis ]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The carinate pronotum evident in these bees may also serve to protect the sensitive areas between the head and pronotum from biting (Pabalan et al, 2000). Similar modifications of the head and pronotum are evident in many halictid bees (Engel et al, 2012;Gibbs et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Journal Of Melittologysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, a pitfall of the ancestral host group reconstruction method arises because some identified hosts might not have yet existed when the ancestral Sphecodes species lived and diverged. According to Gibbs et al [58], [70], the most recent common ancestor of Sphecodes lived before approximately 25 MYA, and the divergence of host Lasioglossum lineages ( Lasioglossum s. s. and other subgenera of this genus) occurred before approximately 30 MYA. These results suggest that the Lasioglossum lineages had already diverged when the MRCA of Sphecodes arose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%