2003
DOI: 10.1080/0020717021000049160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual mode predictive tracking of piecewise constant references for constrained linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to overcome this problem several solutions have been proposed [Camacho and Bordons, 2004, Rossiter et al, 1996, Chisci and Zappa, 2003. In [Pannocchia andKerrigan, 2005, Pannocchia, 2004] the set-point change is considered equivalent to a disturbance to be rejected and asymptotic stability and offset-free is ensured by integrating a disturbance model in the prediction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this problem several solutions have been proposed [Camacho and Bordons, 2004, Rossiter et al, 1996, Chisci and Zappa, 2003. In [Pannocchia andKerrigan, 2005, Pannocchia, 2004] the set-point change is considered equivalent to a disturbance to be rejected and asymptotic stability and offset-free is ensured by integrating a disturbance model in the prediction model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of augmenting the system with a new state as in Chisci and Zappa [2003], Limon et al [2008] the main concept here is to introduce an extra optimization variable, λ k , which scales the terminal set, T . The scaling allows us to move the terminal constraint set to an arbitrary setpoint,x k , since the terminal set can be scaled down to a single point, i.e., T =x k , eliminating the need for any online recalculation of T as in Rao and and the terminal constraint set can possibly be far simpler than the terminal set for an augmented system.…”
Section: The Proposed Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To recalculate the terminal constraint set can however require complex calculations to be performed online and might thus not be suitable for systems where the setpoint changes often. A far better approach has been proposed in different forms by several authors Chisci and Zappa [2003], Limon et al [2008] and Ferramosca et al [2009]. In Chisci and Zappa [2003] the authors augment the system with a new constant state which corresponds to the reference signal providing a terminal constraint set in the higher dimension (x, r ) which contains the whole feasible equilibrium set for any given reference, i.e., the terminal constraint set is a fixed set which can be pre-calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations