Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the most successful surgical procedure in orthopedics. However, dislocation remains the main indication for surgical revision. New designs of dual mobility cups (DMC) have lowered the classical complications and have extended the indications of DMC in elective surgeries. Our aim is to assess the trend of DMC indications in THA as well as the incidence of their dislocation. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing THA with DMC during the years 2015 and 2021. The original indication for DMC included patients sustaining neck of femur fractures (NOF#) and associated risk factors for dislocations. Five years later, DMC was considered our standard of care in total hip arthroplasty. The approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) was chosen by the surgeon according to his/her preferences, as was the implant. Data collected included patients’ demographics, diagnosis, admission time, surgical approach, cup models, and inclination and complications. Patients sustaining a hip dislocation were prospectively reviewed and assessed for treatment received, new dislocations, and need for surgical revision. Two groups were created for the analysis according to the presence or absence of dislocation during follow-up. Results: In the analysis, 531 arthroplasties were included (mean age 72.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 2.86 years. The trend of indications for DMC increased from 16% of THA in 2015 to 78% of THA in 2021. We found a total of 8 dislocations (1.5%), none of them associated with elective surgery. Closed reduction was unsatisfactory in four cases (50%). There was one case of intraprosthetic dislocation. Dislocations were associated to smaller heads (22 mm) (1.5% vs. 25%, p = 0.008) and cups (51.2 mm vs. 48.7 mm, p = 0.038) and posterior approach (62.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.011). Conclusion: Dual mobility cups are a great option to reduce the risk of dislocation after a THA both in the neck of femur fractures and elective cases. The use of an anterolateral approach in THA after a neck or femur fracture might considerably decrease the risk of dislocation.

Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty: Should It Be Revised Using Dual Mobility Implants? A Retrospective Analysis from the R.I.P.O. Registry

“…We found that DMC was used more frequently in revision surgery for instability in patients slightly older than those receiving a standard cup, [ 17 , 21 , 22 ], confirming the findings of Mohaddes et al which showed an average age of 75 years for DMC implants, and 73 years for standard cup. Viste et al [ 23 ], in a retrospective study of DMC use in hip revision surgery in 383 patients, reported a mean age at surgery of 78 years.…”

Running-in behavior of dual-mobility cup during the gait cycle: A finite element analysis

“…In the opinion of certain researchers, the optimal head size was 28 mm. 4,54,55 Aguado-Maestro et al 56 reported a substantial rise in the risk of dislocation associated with a 22 mm head diameter compared to a 28 mm head diameter.…”

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Ochronotic Arthropathy: A Case Report

“…Based on previously published data, DMC demonstrated greater efficacy compared to other implants in patients who underwent THA. In addition, a study found that the dual mobility group had a significantly lower rate of dislocation than the conventional group (1.5% vs. 6.7%) [ 13 ]. Moreover, in another study consisting of 28 patients with ochronotic arthropathy, the DMC provided excellent stability and a low rate of dislocation, with no instances of component revision or dislocation.…”