2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60702-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Loop Motion Control for Geometric Errors and Joint Clearances Compensation of a Planar 2-PRP+1-PPR Manipulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, controlling these machines is a cumbersome task due to the lack of a direct measurement of the manipulator’s end-effector pose (Paccot et al, 2009; Colombo et al, 2019). Furthermore, despite researchers having employed vision-based techniques and image processing algorithms for acquiring the end-effector’s position and orientation (Mohan et al, 2017; Colombo et al, 2019), these approaches must cope with tight sampling time requirements to avoid performance limitations and stability issues. These requirements impose a severe challenge to the viability of this solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, controlling these machines is a cumbersome task due to the lack of a direct measurement of the manipulator’s end-effector pose (Paccot et al, 2009; Colombo et al, 2019). Furthermore, despite researchers having employed vision-based techniques and image processing algorithms for acquiring the end-effector’s position and orientation (Mohan et al, 2017; Colombo et al, 2019), these approaches must cope with tight sampling time requirements to avoid performance limitations and stability issues. These requirements impose a severe challenge to the viability of this solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A redundant feedback strategy at the joint and task-space level are proposed by ref. [26] using appropriate sensors. Using this approach, the actual error of the joint displacements are computed, improving the control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%