2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual ion selective fluorescence sensor with potential applications in sample monitoring and membrane sensing

Abstract: A new sensing functionalized chemosensor 3-hydroxy-2-(1H-indol-3-yl)-4H-chromen-4-one (M1) was readily prepared in facile reaction conditions and explored its sensing nature response towards metal ions in semi-aqueous medium. The chemosensor M1 exhibited high selective and sensitive fluorescence turn "off-on" response for Al 3+ and Zn 2+ ions in the existence of several metal ions and the changes are enabled for naked-eye detection. These high selectivity expressed by high binding constants 2.62 × 10 4 (Al 3+… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the literature surrounding anion sensors relies on a binding event that disrupts/enhances some type of electron transfer mechanism such as photoinduced electron transfer (PET), internal charge transfer (ICT), excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), etc. to yield a measurable fluorescence response (de Silva et al, 1997; Wu et al, 2011; Fan et al, 2013; Lee et al, 2015; Kumawat et al, 2017; Sedgwick et al, 2018). Some more recent reports take advantage of aggregation induced emission (AIE) (Hong et al, 2011), whereby recognition of an anion causes aggregation of the sensor thereby reducing molecular rotation and inducing large fluorescence perturbations (Peng et al, 2009; Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the literature surrounding anion sensors relies on a binding event that disrupts/enhances some type of electron transfer mechanism such as photoinduced electron transfer (PET), internal charge transfer (ICT), excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), etc. to yield a measurable fluorescence response (de Silva et al, 1997; Wu et al, 2011; Fan et al, 2013; Lee et al, 2015; Kumawat et al, 2017; Sedgwick et al, 2018). Some more recent reports take advantage of aggregation induced emission (AIE) (Hong et al, 2011), whereby recognition of an anion causes aggregation of the sensor thereby reducing molecular rotation and inducing large fluorescence perturbations (Peng et al, 2009; Ma et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1). The dissociation constant (K d ) of this complex, as derived from the uorescence titration data using Benesi-Hildebrand equation [28,29], was 5.4 x 10 -6 mol L -1 (Fig. S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a solution of 3,3-bis(methylsulfanyl)-1-(pyridin-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (1) (225 mg, 1 mmol) [26] in pyridine (5 mL), guanidine carbonate (2) (270 mg, 1.5 mmol) was added and the mixture was re uxed for 5 h. The reaction mixture was poured into 100 mL of ice water, and the precipitate was collected by ltration, washed with water, and dried overnight. The product was recrystallized from methanol to give Benesi-Hidebrand plot [28,29].…”
Section: Synthesis Of 4-(methylsulfanyl)-6-(pyridin-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-amine (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job’s plot was used to investigate the binding stoichiometries of 3a,b , 4a,b , and 5a,b to Zn 2+ . The dissociation constant ( K d ) values were investigated by the following Benesi–Hildebrand plot [19,20]. 1/( F – F 0 ) = 1/{ K a ( F max – F 0 )[Zn 2+ ] n } + 1/( F max – F 0 ) where F is the fluorescence intensity, F 0 is the fluorescence intensity without Zn 2+ , and F max is the fluorescence in addition of excess Zn 2+ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%