2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Intervention to Improve Pathologic Staging of Resectable Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgeons may feel that the final lymph node number may be partially out of their control, however interventions such as using a pre-labeled collection kit have increased lymph node yield. [2021]…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgeons may feel that the final lymph node number may be partially out of their control, however interventions such as using a pre-labeled collection kit have increased lymph node yield. [2021]…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two widely used manuals of gross dissection describe methods to achieve this, but may need to be modified in view of these findings, and reports of improved intrapulmonary lymph node yield from a novel gross dissection protocol [34–36]. The stage-migration possible with the combination of corrective interventions to improve surgical and pathology processes has also been reported, including the impact on post-operative adjuvant therapy eligibility rates [37]. If validated in prospective studies involving more heterogeneous practice settings, wide dissemination and implementation of such improved processes as the standard of care for curative-intent lung cancer resection may provide a practical means of improving lung cancer survival at the broad population level.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 We are actively engaged in a tri-state regional dissemination and implementation study, in which the combination of interventions will be rigorously studied to evaluate the impact on the workload of operating room and pathology laboratory staff, overall stage distribution, and patient survival. These studies will provide a robust cost-effectiveness and overall economic impact analysis of the proposed changes in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%