Background
National organizations have recommended quality measures for surgery in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The outcomes of adherence to these guidelines are unknown.
Methods
Clinical stage I NSCLC surgery patients were abstracted from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). After reviewing current guidelines, the following quality measures were selected: anatomic resection, surgery within 8 weeks of diagnosis, R0 resection, and sampling ≥10 lymph nodes. Multivariate models identified variables independently associated with receiving quality measures and a Cox model created to evaluate overall survival.
Results
Between 2004 and 2013, 133,026/133,366 (99.7%), 126,598/133,366 (94.9%), 91,472/133,366 (68.6%), and 30,041/133,366 (22.5%) patients met 1, 2, 3, or 4 measures. Income ≥ $38,000/year (OR 1.20, 1.15–1.24), insurance type (private insurance OR 1.22, 1.09 – 1.36, Medicare OR 1.16, 1.04 – 1.30), centers with ≥38 cases/year (OR 1.18, 1.14–1.22), academic institutions (OR 1.31, 1.27–1.35), and clinical Stage IB patients (OR 1.50, 1.40 – 1.60) were more likely to meet all 4 measures; while increasing age (OR 0.99, 0.99–0.99), females (0.93, 0.91 – 0.96), non-Caucasian race (OR 0.83, 0.79 – 0.87) and increasing Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score (1: OR 0.90, 0.87–0.93, ≥2: OR 0.82, 0.79–0.86) were associated with lower likelihood. Pathologic upstaging (HR 1.84, 1.78–1.89) and meeting all 4 measures (HR 0.39, 0.31–0.48) were most powerfully associated with overall survival.
Conclusions
National adherence to quality measures in stage I NSCLC resection is suboptimal. Guideline compliance is strongly associated with survival and vigorous efforts should be instituted by national societies to improve adherence.