2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iccsn.2016.7586654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Hop Differential Amplify-and-Forward relaying with selection combining cooperative diversity over Nakagami-m fading channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we propose and investigate the impact of NN-based RTN on the AF relaying network. • Further, without CSI knowledge, the amplification factor for the conventional AF relay node becomes a fixed value depending on the second-order statistics of the channel between the source to relay node and noise variances [22]- [28]. It is evident that fixed amplification factor is a sub-optimal approach for the AF scheme, thus, we also show that by utilizing a power normalization layer that normalizes the transmission power of n symbols to n at the AF relay node, we can improve the process of deciding the amplification factor, while keeping the signal transmission-reception in the analog domain and removing the requirement of second-order channel statistics and noise variances at the relay and CSI knowledge at the destination node.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we propose and investigate the impact of NN-based RTN on the AF relaying network. • Further, without CSI knowledge, the amplification factor for the conventional AF relay node becomes a fixed value depending on the second-order statistics of the channel between the source to relay node and noise variances [22]- [28]. It is evident that fixed amplification factor is a sub-optimal approach for the AF scheme, thus, we also show that by utilizing a power normalization layer that normalizes the transmission power of n symbols to n at the AF relay node, we can improve the process of deciding the amplification factor, while keeping the signal transmission-reception in the analog domain and removing the requirement of second-order channel statistics and noise variances at the relay and CSI knowledge at the destination node.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without the CSI knowledge, we utilize traditional differential modulation and demodulation techniques at the source and destination node, such as differential QPSK (d-QPSK) and MLD decoding. The traditional differential schemes are near optimal because there is no selection combining cooperative diversity at the destination nodes [22]- [28]. However, the amplification factor designed in (2) utilizes the channel gain information and noise variances.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 6, a conclusion about this article is given. It is worth mentioning that preliminary analytical derivations and results of this work have been presented in Reference 56.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are easy to implement but they don't utilize the channel efficiently. Amplify-and-Forward (AF) and the DF relaying techniques were explained in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. On the other hand, in [27,28], the authors derived the BER and the OP of Rayleigh channels with AF fixed relaying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%