“…To contextualize the active site fragments, we first analyzed the binding modes of known HAO1 inhibitors, by comparing a 1.2 Å resolution structure of hHAO1 bound with 5-[(4-methylphenyl)sulfanyl]-1,2,3-thiadiazole-4-carboxylic acid (CCPST) determined in this study (PDB code 6gmc; Supplementary Table S2 and Figure S4 ), with reported structures of triazole, dioxo-pyrroline, benzoic acid, and indazole carboxylic acid inhibitors bound to either spinach glycolate oxidase (sGOX; PDB codes 1al7 and 1al8; Stenberg and Lindqvist, 1997 ) or hHAO1 ( Supplementary Figure S5 ; PDB codes 2rdt ( Murray et al, 2008 ), 2w0u ( Bourhis et al, 2009 ), 6w44, 6w45, 6w4c ( Lee et al, 2021 ) and 7m2o ( Ding et al, 2021 )), sGOX-FMN-glyoxylate (PDB code 1gox; Lindqvist, 1989 ) and hHAO1-FMN-glycolate (PDB codes 2nzl ( Mackinnon et al, 2018 ) and 6gmb, determined in this study). These inhibitor-bound structures all demonstrate similar features: displacement of residues lining the substrate-binding pocket (Tyr26, Trp110, Tyr132, Arg167, Arg263) relative to glycolate/glyoxylate-bound hHAO1 structures, interaction with residues involved in substrate turnover (Asp160, Lys236, His260), and disruption of the hydrogen bonding network posited to maintain gating loop conformation during catalysis (Trp110, Tyr134, Leu191, Tyr208; ( Murray et al, 2008 )) ( Supplementary Table S3 and Figure S5 ).…”