2007
DOI: 10.4310/cntp.2007.v1.n4.a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Feynman transform for modular operads

Abstract: We introduce and study the notion of a dual Feynman transform of a smodular operad. This generalizes and gives a conceptual explanation of Kontsevich's dual construction producing graph cohomology classes from a contractible differential graded Frobenius algebra. The dual Feynman transform of a modular operad is indeed linear dual to the Feynman transform introduced by Getzler and Kapranov when evaluated on vacuum graphs. In marked contrast to the Feynman transform, the dual notion admits an extremely simple p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One should also be able to associate a differential graded Lie algebra to this modular operad which recovers the homology of this graph complex. For a treatment of graph complexes from the perspective of modular operads, the reader may consult [CL07].…”
Section: The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One should also be able to associate a differential graded Lie algebra to this modular operad which recovers the homology of this graph complex. For a treatment of graph complexes from the perspective of modular operads, the reader may consult [CL07].…”
Section: The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the symmetrization (18) clearly commutes with the non-Σ modular envelope functor, Theorem 37 implies the isomorphisms (27) Mod(Ass) ∼ = Sym Span( * M ) proved in [6,9] though not expressed in this form there. Let us start proving the isomorphisms (26a) and (26b) of Theorem 35.…”
Section: Modular Envelopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by the example of Mod( * C ), one would expect Mod( * C ) to be the (symmetrization of) the terminal Set-operad in the conjectural category of non-Σ modular operads. The description of Mod( * C ) given in [9,Theorem 3.1] and its relation to the moduli space of Riemann surfaces with boundaries [6,Theorem 3.7] therefore gives some feeling what non-Σ modular operads should be.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations