Dual‐facing bridges and brokers: Diaspora politics and Chinese voluntary associations

Abstract

This commentary introduces the term ‘dual facing’ to describe the way that Chinese voluntary associations orientate themselves as collectives situated between the ancestral land (China) and their countries of settlement. The commentary uses examples of Chinese voluntary associations in Singapore and Myanmar to reflect on China's longstanding presence and expanding reach in Southeast Asia, including through its diaspora engagement with the Chinese abroad. It argues that such associations are embedded not only in the nation‐building efforts of their countries of settlement, but also the ancestral land. However, this dual‐facing orientation also means that they can become embroiled in conflictual domestic and foreign politics at both ends, potentially jeopardising how they are otherwise seen as bridges and brokers by China and in the countries where have settled.

Moving beyond survivalism? Youth perspectives on non‐Mandarin Chinese languages in the study of Chinese voluntary associations in Singapore and Vancouver

“…Survivalist tendencies are found in various studies of the voluntary sector aimed at explaining the evolutions of community associations, referring to organisational or institutional survival (Wollebaek, 2009), ethnic survival (Cohen, 2013) and collective struggles for recognition, representation, or the status quo (Cornuelle and Annunziata, 2017). CVAs have been instrumental in providing the social infrastructure necessary for individuals to survive, including for migration and settlement purposes (Zhou, 2018;Ho, 2023), but the survivalist tendencies found in the study of CVAs in the Anglosphere create significant conceptual limitations, which leads us to propose a new vantage point for such assessments.…”